Dear Martin, all,I am outside my comfort zone here, but I think this is particularly relevant to conservation so I had a look at it and made a few comments/changes. Please see attached (compressed due to attachment size limitations).
All the best, Thanasis On 24/03/17 12:33, martin wrote:
Dear All,
I propose the following:
Class Declarations
*Activity Plan***
Subclass of: E29 Design or Procedure
Superclass of:
Scope note: This class comprises plans for some specific
predefined activities or some kinds of activities to happen. They
consist of descriptions of specific constraints, patterns or types of
activities that could be realized. They may also foresee that the
planned activities are be realized at times explicitly foreseen by the
actor intending the application of the plan, for instance, to organize a
conference, in which case we may talk about “active plans”.
Alternatively, times of realization may be foreseen in reaction to an
external kind of event foreseen by the plan, for instance a rescue
action in case of earthquake according to a rescue plan, or a penal
action in case of criminal activity according to a law, in which case we
may talk about “reactive plans”. An instance of Activity Plan does not
imply the intention of any Actor to apply it. It may be created
together, before or without the will to apply it. For instance, laws are
created before they are passed in the parliament.
Examples:
Properties:
*Intention to Apply***
Subclass of: S16 State
Superclass of:
Scope note: This class comprises the mental state of intention or
wanting to apply a particular instance of Activity Plan by a particular
E39 Actor. This can be understood as the period of time that an
individual or a group holds a particular will. It binds the activity
plan to the actor. The intention to apply may be abandoned before the
realization of the plan. When the plan is realized, the intention to
apply must still exist. Characteristically, the passing of a law
initiates the intention of a parliament to apply a law. In many cases,
the creation of the plan initiates the intention to apply it, and in
case of “active plans” the realization ends the intention. Often, the
existence of the intention to apply cannot be determined other by the
realization of the plan.
Examples:
Properties:
is intention of: E31 Actor
is expressed in: Expression of Intention
to apply within : E61 Time Primitive
initiated by: E7 Activity
ended by: E7 Activity
intends to apply: Activity Plan
*Expression of Intention *(may be not necessary)**
Subclass of: E31 Document
Superclass of:
Scope note: This class comprisesthe externalisation, the
expression of the Intention to Apply in the form of identifiable
immaterial objects, such as texts, that make propositions about these
intentions. These are kind of formal texts, legal documents,
proceedings, minutes etc. that document the will, the intentions of the
actor.
Examples:
Properties:
Property Declaration
is intention of (has intention)
Domain: Intention to Apply
Range: E39 Actor
Quantification: (1,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates an instance of EXX Intention
to Apply an activity plan with the actors intending it.
Examples: “A Paliament regarding a law as being decided”
is expressed in (has expression)
Domain: Intention to Apply
Range: Expression of Intention
Quantification:
Scope note: This property associates an Intention to Apply with
the externalisation of this intention (Expression) in a document.
Examples:
to apply within
Domain: Intention to Apply
Range: E61 Time Primitive (Declarative Time-span)
Quantification: (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates an instance of EXX Intention
to Apply with a statement of the time constraint for the actual
application. This may vary with time. In case the change narrows down
the time constraint, one may regard this as being simultaneously true
and consistent. In case the new time constraint exceeds the previous one
(typically delays), we may talk about a modification of the overall
intention to apply, which could be regarded as a part of the overall
intention, which continuous to be maintained.
Examples: “Law XXX to be in force from 1.1.2018”
initiated by (initiates)
Domain: Intention to Apply
Range: E7 Activity
Quantification: (0,1:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates the beginning of an
instance of EXX Intention to Applywith an explicit activity initiating
it. Often, the initiation of intention to apply is implicit in the
creation of the activity plan.
Examples: “Parliament XX deciding law YY”
ended by (ends)
Domain: Intention to Apply
Range: E7 Activity
Quantification: (0,1:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates the end of an instance of
EXX Intention to Applywith an explicit activity terminating it. Often,
the termination of intention to apply is implicit in the realization of
the activity plan. In other cases, it is silently forgotten
Examples:
*realized (is realised by)***
Domain: E7 Activity
Range: Activity Plan
Quantification: (0,n:0,n)
Scope note: This property associates a particular instance of E7
Activity which realized an Activity Plan in a way regarded as valid by
the actors intending it. (Should we require that a realization falls
within the period of intending it?)
Examples: “Getting a fine following paragraph XXX.” “I have
built my house (not me alone…)”
Best,
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<<attachment: model-for-plans-AV.zip>>
