Dear Robert I have been following your remarks in the last few weeks, but for lack of time could not comment on them.
However, I can do that on your latest messsge. My comment is the following question: what is a (digital) 3D model? I think I know (a good approximation of) the answer but I am not sure everybody does. Of course the definition must be robust enough to pass the Ontoclean test. Asking the above also puts a shadow of unclarity also on (digital) photos and the like. Maybe this is not relevant to CRM, maybe it is. Apologies if the question is off-topic. Best regards Franco Il giorno mar 18 apr 2017 alle 20:55 Robert Sanderson <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > All, > > Perhaps something we can agree on … but we’ll see… > > The second example of P138 represents describes a 3D model (an E73) that > represents a sculpture. However P138 represents is defined with a domain > of a sub-class of E73, E36. > That means that digital 3D model files are actually considered to be E36 > Visual Items. Is that correct? > > If so, can we update the scope notes of E36 to include that, and change > E73 to E36 in the example for P138. > > If not … can we remove that example? And how /would/ you link a 3D model > to the work that it … represents? > > Many thanks! > > Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >
