Martin, Can you please give a use case where "mental state" is required to express a concept actually found in cultural heritage documentation?
Thanks, Richard On 10/01/2018 20:28, Martin Doerr wrote: > Dear All, > > I propose to introduce a class "mental state" as superclass of > intention and belief. > I argue that "mental state" is neither a relationship nor a "state" in > the epistemological sense > we have defined, regardless the label. I argue that it is actively > maintained, can be witnessed, become weak, fuzzy and depends > existentially on > the carrier, possibly a group. As such, it is a phenomenon in its own > right. I regard it to be directly a subclass of > E2, parallel to the condition state. > > Best, > > Martin > -- *Richard Light*
