Hi,

I agree with Martin's proposed rewording.

Richard

On 31/07/2018 18:22, Martin Doerr wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> The current scope note of E94 Space Primitive reads:
>
>
>       E94 Space Primitive
>
> Subclass of:         _E59 <#_E59_Primitive_Value>_ Primitive Value
>
>  
>
> Scope Note:        This class comprises instances of E59 Primitive
> Value for space that should be implemented with appropriate
> validation, precision and references to spatial coordinate systems to
> express geometries on or relative to earth, or any other stable
> constellations of matter, relevant to cultural and scientific
> documentation.
>
> An E94 Space Primitive defines an E53 Place in the sense of a
> declarative place as elaborated in CRMgeo (Doerr and Hiebel 2013),
> which means that the identity of the place is derived from its
> geometric definition. This declarative place allows for the
> application of all place properties to relate phenomenal places to
> their approximations expressed with geometries.
>
> Definitions of instances of E53 Place using different spatial
> reference systems always result in definitions of different instances
> of E53 place approximating each other.
>
>  
>
> Instances of E94 Space Primitive provide the ability to link CRM
> encoded data to the kinds of geometries used in maps or Geoinformation
> systems. They may be used for visualisation of the instances of E53
> Place they define, in their geographic context and for computing
> topological relations between places based on these geometries.
>
> Note that it is possible for a place to be defined by phenomena causal
> to it or other forms of identification rather than by an instance of
> E94 Space Primitive. In this case, this property must not be used for
> approximating the respective instance of E53 Place with an instance of
> E94 Space Primitive.  E94 Space Primitive is not further elaborated
> upon within this model. Compatibility with OGC standards are recommended.
>
> The last paragraph above talks about the property. This is wrong. I
> propose:
>
> *new last paragraph*:
>
> Note that it is possible for a place to be defined by phenomena causal
> to it, such as a settlement or a riverbed, or other forms of
> identification rather than by an instance of E94 Space Primitive. Any
> geometric approximation of such a place by an instance ofE94 Space
> Primitiveconstitutes an instance of E53 Place in its own right, i.e.,
> the approximating one. E94 Space Primitive is not further elaborated
> upon within this model. Compatibility with OGC standards are recommended.
>
> Please comment.
>
> Martin
>
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
>  Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
>                                |  Email: [email protected] |
>                                                              |        
>                Center for Cultural Informatics               |
>                Information Systems Laboratory                |
>                 Institute of Computer Science                |
>    Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
>                                                              |
>                N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
>                 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
>                                                              |
>              Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl           |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

-- 
*Richard Light*

Reply via email to