Yes

Richard

On 15/11/2018 14:24, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear All,

Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as 
well:

P58 has section definition (defines section)
Domain:              E18 Physical Thing
Range:                E46 Section Definition

Quantification:    one to many, dependent, (0,n:1,1)

Scope note:         This property links an area (section) named by a E46 
Section Definition to the instance of E18 Physical Thing upon                   
          which it is found.
                        The CRM handles sections as locations (instances of E53 
Place) within or on E18 Physical Thing that are identified by                   
          E46 Section Definitions. Sections need not be discrete and separable 
components or parts of an object.
                        This is part of a more developed path from ‘E18 
Physical Thing’ through ‘P58 has section definition’, ‘E46 Section              
                     Definition, P87 is identified by, E44 Place Appellation 
that allows a more precise definition of a location found on an                 
            object than the shortcut P59 has section (is located on or within).

                        A particular instance of a Section Definition only 
applies to one instance of Physical Thing.

Examples:

§  HMS Victory (E22) has section definition “poop deck of HMS Victory” (E46)



PLEASE VOTE : YES for Deprecating, NO for not deprecating, by Nov. 23 2018.

Best,

Martin

--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr

 Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics

 Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece

 Vox:+30(2810)391625
 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl




_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr<mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--
Richard Light

Reply via email to