On 1/10/2019 7:23 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
In the current RDFS vocabulary, there isn’t a P168i definition, as the
range of P168 is a literal, and literals cannot be the subject of triples.
However, with the decision in Berlin to make P168 a sub property of
P1, P168i could be defined with E41 as its domain.
Given the sub property decision, this becomes feasible and I think
should be done?
Yes, good point!:-)
Martin
Rob
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
