Ha, and now I find also the note to make it a subclass of E2. Carry on, nothing to see here!
Rob From: Robert Sanderson <[email protected]> Date: Friday, January 11, 2019 at 1:59 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Issue 333: E101 as subclass of S16 Dear all, In the notes about resolving issue 333, we resolved to create E101 Intention to Apply as a subclass of S16 State. Could we revisit that discussion, as having a core CRM class that is a subclass of an extension class is indicative of either that E101 should be in an extension as well, or that S16 (or similar) should be part of the core ontology. Currently, the core ontology is unable to be implemented without S16, which (thankfully) is only an additional class between E2 and E3. This seems to fit in with the discussion about State or Phase in Berlin, as well. Thanks, Rob
