Re: [Crm-sig] Space time volumes

[Dan Matei]

Hi fiends,

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 19:20, Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> Nevertheless, we used the term informally in the CRM. We could name E92 as 
> "abstract".

For me, some E92 are not abstract. E.g. I instantiate "Byzantine
Period" (it is somwhat difficult to place it in South America :-) :

<#ByzantinePeriod> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
<#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <330-1700>
<#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#EsternEurope>
<#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Levant>
<#ByzantinePeriod> <crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#NorthAfrica>

Also:

<#BronzeAge1> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
<#BronzeAge1> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept>
<#BronzeAge1> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?1>
<#BronzeAge1><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#JapaneseIslands>

<#BronzeAge2> <isA> <crm:E92_Spacetime_Volume>
<#BronzeAge2> <crm:P2 has_type> <#BronzeAge-Concept>
<#BronzeAge2> <crm:P160_has_temporal_projection> <p?2>
<#BronzeAge2><crm:P161_has_spatial_projection> <#Scandinavia>

Should I worry ?

Dan