A “Yes” from me.
Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] LinkedIn Profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/> https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin Doerr Sent: 05 April 2019 17:07 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE Dear All, It's an oversight indeed! PLEASE VOTE YES, if you agree with P189 approximates (is approximated by). Martin On 4/5/2019 6:51 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: Dear all, In the 6.2.4 PDF, there isn’t a definition of the inverse property of P189 approximates. One would imagine P189i is approximated by. Given that the relationship has a direction (A approximates B), and in Geo this would be between Declarative and Phenomenal Places, this seems like an oversight? Or am I missing something about the relationship that means an inverse is not necessary? Many thanks! Rob _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- ------------------------------------ Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece Vox:+30(2810)391625 Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
