Dear Patrick,

Thank you very much for your elaborate thoughts!:-)

On 5/13/2019 11:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Dear Martin, and dear all,
I'm sorry I couldn't attend the meeting, and I'm therefore not aware of the discussions that underlie this scope note. I think that the idea of declaring a specific class for the process of conveying information in a sensory form (for this is how I understand this new class) is extremely useful and interesting, so much so that I think it shouldn't be confined to LRMoo alone, but should be uplifted into CIDOC CRM, with additional examples taken from the universe of discourse of CIDOC CRM (such as a sculptor making a sculpture, an art student painting a copy of Mona Lisa, the Greek runner notifying Athenian citizens that their soldiers have won the Marathon battle, etc. -- perhaps even Martin or Steve giving a CIDOC CRM tutorial?).
That is indeed a justified thought, but all the context comes from LRM, and we have problems to keep CRMbase concise enough. So I'd rather tend to leave it in LRM.
In the proposed scope note, which is overall fine with me, I simply have some doubts about the clause "intended for being received in this completeness by some audience"; while I agree that this is generally the case, there are also many counter-examples: rehearsals are instances of Externalization Event, although the intention is only indirect here (performers rehearse in order to improve what the audience will receive in a later event); a teenager writing a diary may not want any audience to read the externalized Expression, and it is unclear whether Franz Kafka or Emily Dickison were OK with the idea of having their externalized Expressions reach an audience, as they requested that all their manuscripts be destroyed after their death; and I'm also thinking of Mediaeval and Eastern performances which are only intended to be seen by God or the gods (unless we regard God or the gods as a valid instance of audience). However, it is possible to solve the issue by saying that the instances of E39 Actor who externalize such Expressions are themselves their own audience, possibly the only audience for which those complete Expressions are intended.

Well, difficult. In any case, the manuscripts were in a form potentially for an external audience. I wrote this phrase to make sure that not each utterance of a phoneme is regarded as externalization event. Since we model "bottom-up", I'd like to make sure we catch well the regular cases. The question, if private notes should be published, is quite interesting. Anybody has a right to hide and destroy his products, be it artists, researchers, technicians or amateurs in any capacity. The posthumous hunt for half-finished products of an artist is another social phenomenon.

For the time being, I'd rather concentrate on the intended externalizations, taking gods for a valid audience. But, we need a good way to describe the posthumous publication of fragmentary material. I'd rather tend to blame the editor for it?

As for the label for the new property, rather than "has memorization", I would think of something like "Rxx is witnessed in / is a witness of" (in the sense of codicology and textual criticism: manuscripts are called "witnesses" of a text tradition). The resulting Expression is but a "witness" of what happened during the Externalization Event.

Sounds intellectually very clean, but I fear the narrower sense of "witness" will confuse people in case of recordings and simple writing??

All the best,

Martin

At any rate, congratulations for this significant addition to the model, no matter whether it is LRMoo or CIDOC CRM!
Best wishes,
Patrick





De : "Martin Doerr" <[email protected]>
A : "crm-sig" <[email protected]>
Date : 12/05/2019 21:38
Objet : [Crm-sig] Homework: New class Externalization for LRMoo
Envoyé par : "Crm-sig" <[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dear All,

Here the scope note for the new class "Externalization Event" proposed in the last meeting. This unifies the expression creation with the performances on a higher level.

The idea being, that the "true" expression is always the activity, often being accidental what is recorded and in which way. The manuscript writing can be seen as a lone performance, with a patient paper under the hand holding the pen;-).

*
Fxx Externalization Event *

Subclass of: E7 Activity

Superclass of:     F28 Expression Creation (may be superclass of E65 Creation!)

F31 Performance

Scope note: This class comprises activities of producing signs or sensory impressions as an organized, coherent and complete whole,intended for being received in this completeness by some audience, either directly via their senses or via persistent media at any later time. It comprises in particular novel expressions of thought, art in all forms, including rendering existing expressions, such as musical scores, theater plays or texts, in an individual way in performing arts or by graphic design. Examples: The creation of the original manuscript score of ‘Uwertura tragiczna’ by Andrzej Panufnik in 1942 in Warsaw (F28) The reconstruction from memory of the manuscript score of ‘Uwertura tragiczna’ by Andrzej Panufnik in 1945 after the original score was destroyed during the war (F28) Performing the ballet entitled ‘Rite of spring’/,/as choreographed by Pina Bausch, in Avignon, at the Popes’ Palace, on July 7, 1995 [individual performance] (F31) Performing the operatic work entitled ‘Dido and Aeneas’, as directed by Edward Gordon Craig and conducted by Martin Shaw, in London, Hampstead Conservatoire, on May 17, 18, and 19, 1900 [run of performances] (F31)

Properties*: *_R19_ <#_R19_created_a>created a realisation of (was realised through): _F1_ <#_F1_Work_1>Work

The property R19 goes up from F28 to new class. We need a more general property from the Externalization Event to the persistent expressions it produced or contributed to, be it a manuscript, a recording, a painting of a theater scene. This property should generalize over_R17_ <#_R17_created_(was>created (was created by): _F2_ <#_F2_Expression>Expression.

I could think of "Rxx has memorization in: F2 Expression".

The point is, that the persistent Expression could be a product directly of the "externalizers" or by the a member of the audience. If an author dictates a text to a scribe, or Platon reporting Sokrates, there is not much difference to someone taking video from a theater performance. This means, that the range of "Rxx has memorization in: F2 Expression" may or may not be product of another expression creation. It will however always require presence of the secondary creators in the primary externalization (or of a robot recording device).

Looking forward to your comments!

Martin

--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr

Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics

Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece

Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]_ <mailto:[email protected]>
Web-site: _http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl_
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Expositions */Manuscrits de l’extrême <https://www.bnf.fr/fr/agenda/manuscrits-de-lextreme>/* – jusqu'au 7 juillet 2019 | François-Mitterrand et */Le Monde en sphères <https://www.bnf.fr/fr/agenda/le-monde-en-spheres>/* – jusqu'au 21 juillet 2019 | François-Mitterrand

*Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement.*


_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr

 Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics

 Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)

 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece

 Vox:+30(2810)391625
 Email: [email protected]
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

Reply via email to