Dear Thanasis, All,
This is a good summary, but I would like to point out, that there is a
fundamental distinction between ontology and uncertainty. Uncertainty is
a question of knowing (epistemology), and not being (ontology) and
pertains to all facts being. Therefore a solution must be generic and
independent from the ontology. Another approach to have properties of
uncertainty from CRM Entity and Primitive Value, and create combinations
of these with the ontological ones. It is equivalent to a .2 property,
but computationally efficient, and standard RDF. It only blows up the
RDFS, but that can be generated automatically.
E13 introduces an additional agency, and is computationally heavy, as
all reification-equivalent constructs.
All the best,
Martin
On 10/19/2019 6:34 PM, Athanasios Velios wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to summarise the discussion about uncertainty with the aim
to produce some guidelines on how to deal with it. Francesco has not
had a chance to review this as I am sending it the last minute, but
Nicola (who has also been considering the problem) had a quick look at
it already.
Please find the document here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17-VzM8RKtrKJappL3KzTPWz_T_rU7T05Qx1WZEinJXQ/edit?usp=sharing
The arguments for or against numerical values of confidence are yet to
be included.
All the best,
Thanasis
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
