Dear All,
I'd like to raise a new issue, how to make recommendations for the types
we recommend in scope notes. Should we create a terminology file in
SKOS, which may be incorporated in whatever vocab?
Best,
Martin
On 6/25/2020 4:33 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Homework from yesterday for issue 475 -- fix the first sentence of the
second paragraph of the scope notes for Transfer of Custody to reflect
the new understanding as described in the new first sentence of the
first paragraph.
Old sentence:
The distinction between the legal responsibility for custody and the
actual physical possession of the object should be expressed using the
property P2 has type (is type of).
New sentence:
In the event that only a single kind of transfer of custody, either
the legal responsibility for the custody or the actual physical
possession of the object but not both, is represented by the E10
Transfer of Custody, this difference should be expressed using the
property P2 has type (is type of).
--
Rob Sanderson
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
