Dear George, I have just proposed a model representation for the CRMinf in another exchange. I put it back here. I use for that the free software DIA (http://dia-installer.de/) and the color code used is the one of the CIDOC card game that you know well ;) I produced the same for the CRMarchaeo and for the CRMba.
Best, Olivier De: "George Bruseker" <[email protected]> À: "crm-sig" <[email protected]> Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Juillet 2020 12:40:29 Objet: [Crm-sig] Modes / Styles of Representing CRM / Ontologies in Diagrams Dear all, In the context of Issue 457 [ http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-457-harmonization-of-graphical-documentation-about-crm | http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-457-harmonization-of-graphical-documentation-about-crm ] We are looking to create style guides for the CRM SIG on how to formulate the diagrams that will go in the documentation (e.g. publication of the standard, web publications etc.). The goal is to create consistent looking documentation that is easily accessible to the CIDOC CRM audience (domain specialists, developers, ontological modellers etc.) This would be an effort to both create a clean and consistent look for the representations, to lower barriers to understanding/adopting CRM, and to more efficiently produce this documentation. Currently we are looking to put together proposals on the possible parameters of the style guide, such as which kinds of arrows to use for general properties, for IsA property, which kinds of boxes/bubbles to use for classes and instances etc. If you have best practice in mind that should be taken into account, can you please share to the list. We will take on board what is shared and make a proposal of different possibilities for voting on by the SIG membership. All best, George _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
