Dear all,
Currently, the .1 property are expressed in CRMPC, as separate RDF file
which, however, use the same namespace of CRM
(http://www.cidoc-crm.org/cidoc-crm/).
The current dualism it appears to be confusing (specifically for first
time adopters), because both CRM and CRMPC encode, using RDF, classes
and properties of the ontology, but they are provided as separated
files.
I was wondering if would not be better to integrate classes and
properties currently expressed in CRMPC within the official RDF of
CIDOC-CRM? Or, alternatively, should CRMPC get its own namespace?
Best,
Nicola
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
