Dear Rob, all,
I agree with you and wonder why this property was added.
Best wishes
Francesco
Le 06.12.19 à 21:48, Robert Sanderson a écrit :
Dear all,
Is P181_has_amount really a useful property, compared to its
super-property of P90_has_value?
They both take numbers, 181 is a subproperty of 90 just as 97 is a
subclass of 54. Their scope notes do not describe any semantic
difference between them, as far as I can tell:
P90: This property allows an instance of E54 Dimension to be
approximated by an instance of E60 Number primitive.
P181: This property establishes the relationship between an instance
of E97 Monetary Amount and the amount of currency, an instance of E60
Number, that it consists of.
As there is no specialization occurring, I do not believe that P181 is
in any way different from P90 and thus we should just use P90 with
Monetary Amounts and remove P181.
Many thanks!
Rob
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
