Dear all, There was a HW to review the text proposed for this issue. I have done so. It is in the google folder linked here.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_TWuqY8tKsowFSWta-T26WEvNaCMNeFu?usp=sharing Look forward to discuss this week. My overall point would be that I'm not sure what the case for this document is in the first place. It does, as the issue points out, seem very close to the knowledge creation text already in the specification. If it is to be a guideline, then I would have more examples (in CRM). I think it is a nice text just wonder where it would work well. Right now it seems more a theoretical point of view than practical guidance. I don't see it conflicting with the thoughts of the existing text in the specification document about the knowledge creation process. I wonder if we could link this to an issue on named graphs and how practically to implement these (in general and with regards to documenting provenance). Best, George
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
