Yes

Pat Riva

Associate University Librarian, Collection Services (on leave)

Concordia University

Vanier Library (VL-301-61)

7141 Sherbrooke Street West

Montreal, QC H4B 1R6

Canada

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

________________________________
From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of E. Tsoulouha via 
Crm-sig <[email protected]>
Sent: July 2, 2021 7:29 AM
To: Crm Sig <[email protected]>
Subject: [Crm-sig] evote: Issue 535 example of Pxxx represents instance of type


Dear all,

According to the decision for issue 535 in the 50th CIDOC CRM SIG meeting, the 
first example of Pxx represents instance of type should be reformulated in 
order to capture the fact that the thing represented is an unnamed instance of 
a particular type --which means that the representation illustrates the 
characteristics of one particular individual, rather than features normally 
associated with a specific type of thing.

The vote is to decide on whether to accept the example, following Martin's 
reformulation.

Example:

The top right image on page 87 in the book 'Pharaoh's Birds' by John Miles 
(E36) represents instance of type hoopoe (Upupa epops) (E55).
[This image is a reproduction of a photograph. The same book shows at the top 
of page 35 an image representing an unnamed ancient Egyptian relief depicting a 
hoopoe and other 'Birds of the Marshes'. In contrast to the photograph, the 
latter image of the ancient Egyptian depiction shows intentionally typical 
rather than individual characteristics of the respective species, and therefore 
should be associated with the property P138 represents with the species name 
hoopoe (Upupa epops)]. (Miles, 1998)

[* citation here: Miles, J. (1998) Pharaoh’s Birds. A guide to ancient and 
present-day birds in Egypt. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press. ISBN 
977 424 490 7]

The possible votes are:

* Yes = accept/agree
* No = do not accept/agree
* Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes,
but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to 
stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and 
reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it 
violates the following principle...')

Please send your e-votes by the 18th of July.

All the best,

Eleni
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to