Dear All,
Whereas the question of asymmetry has been reformulated for P130, the
respective corrections have not been carried out for P139:
*P130 shows features of (features are also found on)*
Domain:
E70 <#_toc8408> Thing
Range:
E70 <#_toc8408> Thing
Superproperty of:
E33 <#_toc7918> Linguistic Object. P73 <#_toc10036>i is translation of:
E33 <#_toc7918> Linguistic Object
E18 <#_toc7650> Physical Thing. P128 <#_toc10784> carries (is carried
by): E90 <#_toc8683> Symbolic Object
Quantification:
many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:
This property generalises the notions of "copy of" and "similar to" into
*a directed relationship*, where the domain expresses the derivative or
influenced item and the range the source or influencing item, i*f such a
direction can be established*. The property can also be used to express
similarity in cases that can be stated between two objects only, without
historical knowledge about its reasons. The property expresses *a
symmetric relationship* in case no direction of influence can be
established either from evidence on the item itself or from historical
knowledge. This holds in particular for siblings of a derivation process
from a common source or non-causal cultural parallels, such as some
weaving patterns.
*BUT!*
**
P139 has alternative form
Domain:
E41 <#_toc8039> Appellation
Range:
E41 <#_toc8039>Appellation
Quantification:
many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:
This property associates an instance of E41 Appellation with another
instance of E41 Appellation that constitutes a derivative or variant of
the former and that may also be used for identifying items identified by
the former, in suitable contexts, independent from the particular item
to be identified. This property should not be confused with additional
variants of names used characteristically for a single, particular item,
such as individual nicknames. It is *an asymmetric relationship*, where
the range expresses the derivative, *if such a direction can be
established*. Otherwise, the*relationship is symmetric*. The
relationship is not transitive.
AND:
P139(x,y) ⇒P139(y,x) ...which is normally wrong
¬P139(x,x) which is not in the scope note.
To be checked, if this had been resolved but editing forgotten!
Best,
Martin
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
