Dear all,
I am not an expert in biology, but the question has aroused a lot of
interest within my organization and I, therefore, allow myself to
provide some animal examples within museum databases.
I don't know if this example has been mentioned before, but the
animals that received the Dickin medal are in my opinion good examples
that animals participated in wars.
As an example, the Canadian War Museum documents a Dickin medal of a
dog named Gander
<https://www.warmuseum.ca/collections/artifact/1312162>. Although
Gander is not widely documented on the museum's website, his Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gander_(dog)> page highlights several
of his heroic acts.
Another similar example would be the rescue dog named Rex (also
documented on Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_(search_and_rescue_dog)>) which is
associated with 4 items from the Imperial War Museums
<https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/search?query=&pageSize=30&media-records=all-records&style=list&filters%5BagentString%5D%5BRex+%28rescue+dog%29%5D=on>.
In addition to the Dickin medal
<https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30083092>, they also
document his harness
<https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30083091>.
Here is a short description from the harness record:
Harness associated with 'Rex', a British Second World War Home
Front 'rescue dog'. 'Rex' was awarded the Dickin medal on 25 April
1945 for outstanding bravery in finding bomb victims, trapped
under fallen debris.
Returning to Canada, the Canadian Museum of History documents 116
artifacts (mostly trophies)
<https://www.historymuseum.ca/collections/?type=all&q1=all%3A%3A_contains%3A%3AAssociated%20Famous%20Animal&sort=title&order=asc&view=grid&size=24&page=1>
won by horses in various horse racing championships. The majority of
horses are identified by their names such as Northern Dancer
<https://www.historymuseum.ca/collections/artifact/2324619> for
example. His biography is really well documented on Wikipedia
<https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Dancer> again.
It also seems important to me to underline that the information on
these horses is currently recorded in the "Person/Institution" field
with an "Associated Famous Animal" tag. I don't know the reasons for
this choice, but I found the association between person and animal
worth mentioning and probably questioning.
I hope these few examples highlight the desire of some institutions to
document the participation of specific animals in documented events.
Finally, I also wanted to mention this Twitter thread
<https://twitter.com/TMPHopkins1/status/1229754120699072513?form=MY01SV&OCID=MY01SV>where
a few people are discussing the best way to describe a goat within
their organizations.
Best,
Philippe
Le mar. 12 oct. 2021 à 04:33, George Bruseker via Crm-sig
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
Hi Athina!
What causes the bird to go from a to b, I guess is the simplest
way to put it. Does it just happen? Is the bird just present in
the event of its migration?
G
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:22 AM athinak <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello,
I am probably missing something here, but regarding these
databases, in
which cases these animals are documented as actors? It seems
that there
are documentations about births and traps and capturing
events, but the
discussion is about activities carried out by them, right?
From my
experience with gbif and darwincore, which a standard that is
widely
used for biodiversity databases, haven't seen definitions of
this kind
of relationships, but maybe I am missing things
or I misunderstood something
BRs
Athina
Στις 2021-10-12 10:02, George Bruseker via Crm-sig έγραψε:
> Hi all,
>
> Here are some examples of databases that deal with individual or
> collectivites of animals NOT as THINGS but as AGENTS:
>
> EMU: Pest Tracking in Museums
>
>
http://help.emu.axiell.com/v6.4/en/Topics/EMu/Traps%20and%20Pest%20Events%20modules.htm
<http://help.emu.axiell.com/v6.4/en/Topics/EMu/Traps%20and%20Pest%20Events%20modules.htm>
>
> Here's a database that tracks the migratory paths of
individual birds:
>
>
https://nationalzoo.si.edu/migratory-birds/migratory-birds-tracking-map
<https://nationalzoo.si.edu/migratory-birds/migratory-birds-tracking-map>
>
> Here's a database that tracks orcas:
>
>
https://theorcaproject.wordpress.com/killer-whale-orca-database/
<https://theorcaproject.wordpress.com/killer-whale-orca-database/>
>
> Here's a database that tracks gorillas:
>
> https://www.gorillasland.com/la-plaine-zoo.php
<https://www.gorillasland.com/la-plaine-zoo.php>
>
> I would say that often something doesn't get documented
because it is
> silenced by the information systems available (see the terrible
> gorilla database), arguably what CIDOC CRM is supposed to aid in
> getting out of (viz. Dominic's textual works issue and
documenting
> context). The fact that people are forced to shoehorn
identifiable
> individuals that they want to document and have discourse
about into
> classes that do not suit them is for me the obvious argument for
> making classes and properties!
>
> Whether there are explicit fields for such data, the natural
world is
> something which unsurprisingly Cultural Heritage is
interested in and
> refers to. Orcas are, for example, highly important animals
within
> different cultural systems in Canada, they are documented
and they are
> documented not as things but as agents. So what is the pressing
> counter point to allowing this expressivity? That there are
too many
> classes and properties. Many would make that argument about
CRMinf or
> about any of our extensions. I suppose it depends on where you
> interest lies. By not opening these categories we effectively
> mute/suppress this voice. Because the limits of the world are my
> language when we choose to oppress a class we choose to
oppress the
> ability to express that object. Or we indeed force the
documentation
> of things that are considered agents as objects. This seems the
> greater harm to my mind.
>
> On the expertise question, I am not sure if we required a
biologist to
> be able to model the notion of Birth or Death. Did we not
use a middle
> level understanding of everyday objects and their
documentation in
> systems in order to be support the recording of standard
kinds of
> facts of interest to a researcher? Birth and Death are not high
> concepts of when conception begins or when the soul leaves
the body,
> they are rough and ready everyday ideas of, there was a
person and an
> event led to its end, there was a person and an event led to its
> death. How the case of modelling animals differs is not
clear to me.
> Did we bring in financial experts model the payment class?
On which
> issues we need an expert and on which issues not is not
clear, nor is
> that expertise counts. As Rob says, having many years of
experience in
> cultural heritage documentation and analysis of such systems
does not
> count? I would think in basic matters like this, it goes
back to the
> ground of coming to a common sense modelling in line with
what is
> considered the best state of knowledge regarding the world.
We KNOW
> that the best state of knowledge is not represented by the
present
> modelling because agency is not just attributed to human beings.
> Therefore, we are presently deliberately out of synch with
the best
> state of knowledge. I would think it behooves (pun intended)
us to
> step up to the plate and get on to making it possible to
express basic
> facts about the world that can be and are referenced in CH data
> systems (such as the existence of animals!).
>
> Best,
>
> George
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:19 AM Pat Riva
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>> Looking at the dates on Lassie and Misha, I see that they were
>> created during the phase when people were trying this under an
>> unwise modification to RDA, and not been revised since.
This would
>> no longer be valid under the latest RDA. And no one has
bothered to
>> propose MARC coding specific to this type of heading,
leading to the
>> ones that were created being shoe-horned into the personal name
>> coding. The proportion of the huge LC names file is too small.
>>
>> As for the fictitious, that was a completely different argument
>> that has also lasted years. Stems from a difficulty in
>> distinguishing between a name and the reality behind it.
>>
>> But these two issues are frequently conflated in the
library world
>> by people trying to use discussion related to why one was
invalid to
>> imply the position on the other issue didn't make sense.
>>
>> The thing is that there is no problem about having a work
about an
>> animal or about a character (as a concept), or have
photographs,
>> films or sound recordings of an animal. but it doesn't make
sense to
>> set up a relationship where these own an item, publish a
>> manifestation, write, compose or translate an expression,
or create
>> a work. So the relationship is other.
>>
>> And a person can choose a pseudonym of any sort (even one that
>> evokes a pet name or is the same as a fictional character),
that
>> still doesn't make the person into a pet. Same as two
people having
>> the "same" name doesn't fuse them into a single human being
in some
>> sort of weird siamese twin situation.
>>
>> Anyhow, I just wanted to to point out that there has been a
lot of
>> ink spilled over these issues, to no real result.
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> Pat Riva
>>
>> Associate University Librarian, Collection Services
>>
>> Concordia University
>>
>> Vanier Library (VL-301-61)
>>
>> 7141 Sherbrooke Street West
>>
>> Montreal, QC H4B 1R6
>>
>> Canada
>>
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> From: Robert Sanderson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: October 11, 2021 5:16 PM
>> To: Pat Riva <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Cc: Martin Doerr <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; George Bruseker
>> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Non-human Actors
>>
>> Attention This email originates from outside the
concordia.ca <http://concordia.ca> [2]
>> domain. // Ce courriel provient de l'exterieur du domaine de
>> concordia.ca <http://concordia.ca> [2]
>>
>> Hi Pat,
>>
>> While that is certainly true from a model-theoretic
perspective, in
>> practice authorities simply create Persons for them which
is, in my
>> opinion, even worse because there is a demonstrated need
which the
>> modeling is intentionally preventing.
>>
>> For example in the Library of Congress:
>> Real animal/people:
>> Lassie:
https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2015016669.html
<https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb2015016669.html> [3]
>>
>>
>> Misha the Dolphin:
https://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/nb2017006372.html
<https://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/nb2017006372.html>
>> [4]
>>
>> And fictitious:
>> Odie (from Garfield):
>> https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017122131.html
<https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2017122131.html> [5]
>>
>> Grumpy Cat: https://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/n2013036964.html
<https://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/n2013036964.html> [6]
>>
>> In ULAN, here's a racehorse/person:
>>
>>
>
https://www.getty.edu/vow/ULANFullDisplay?find=&role=&nation=&subjectid=500353456
<https://www.getty.edu/vow/ULANFullDisplay?find=&role=&nation=&subjectid=500353456>
>> [7]
>>
>> ISNI has a dog/person called Maggie Mayhem:
>> https://isni.org/isni/ <https://isni.org/isni/>
[8]0000000497302960
>>
>> And so on.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 4:50 PM Pat Riva via Crm-sig
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Just to remark that the library world discussed non-human
actors
>> for many years (in the literal sense of actor as in the
dogs that
>> portrayed Lassie in the TV series, or that portrayed Sykes
and Paddy
>> from Midsomer Murders, somehow it is always cute dogs that are
>> brought up in the discussion).
>>
>> The desire was to list the named animal actors in the
credits for
>> the cast of a film and provide access via their "real"
names the
>> same as for the rest of the cast, and so using the same
mechanisms
>> as for human actors.
>>
>> This sounds like it might be fine until you realize that
making the
>> dog a valid LRM-E6 Agent means that it can have the full
range of
>> responsibility relationships to works, expressions,
manifestations
>> and items. Which becomes absurd.
>>
>> And while is it understood that one can easily film an
individual
>> animal, it isn't clear that it is behaving as an actor
intending to
>> create a cinematographic work in the same way that the human
>> participants. There was also no clear consensus on which
sorts of
>> animals were individually interesting enough to merit this
>> treatment, rather than just being viewed as an instance of
their
>> species (as in nature documentaries).
>>
>> The animal agent option was rejected in FRBR and again
rejected in
>> LRM, and a LRM-E6 Agent (= E39 Actor) remains restricted to
either
>> individual human beings (LRM-E7 Person) or groups of human
beings
>> (LRM-E8 Collective Agent, or F55 Collective Agent in LRMoo).
>>
>> The current compromise is that the animal actors, if it is
desired
>> to provide access points for them, are established as
instances of a
>> subcategory of LRM-E1 Res that is disjoint from LRM-E6
Agent. There
>> was talk of creating some guidelines for this at one point,
but I
>> have not followed the issue since then.
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> Pat Riva
>>
>> Associate University Librarian, Collection Services
>>
>> Concordia University
>>
>> Vanier Library (VL-301-61)
>>
>> 7141 Sherbrooke Street West
>>
>> Montreal, QC H4B 1R6
>>
>> Canada
>>
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> From: Crm-sig <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of George
>> Bruseker via Crm-sig <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Sent: October 11, 2021 3:02 PM
>> To: Martin Doerr <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Non-human Actors
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I think Rob listed in the introduction to the issue the use
cases of
>> documentation of individual action of animals.
>>
>> It would seem that natural scientists don't only study
species but
>> also individuals.
>>
>> Here's a smattering of pieces culled from casual reading in
the past
>> few weeks with nice motivations and examples for these new
classes.
>>
>>
>
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/29/new-zealand-kea-can-use-touchscreens-but-cant-distinguish-between-real-and-virtual-worlds
<https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/29/new-zealand-kea-can-use-touchscreens-but-cant-distinguish-between-real-and-virtual-worlds>
>> [9]
>>
>>
>
https://www.businessinsider.com/watch-australias-google-delivery-drone-attacked-by-raven-mid-air-2021-9?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=sf-insider-inventions&utm_medium=social
<https://www.businessinsider.com/watch-australias-google-delivery-drone-attacked-by-raven-mid-air-2021-9?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=sf-insider-inventions&utm_medium=social>
>> [10]
>>
>>
>
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/what-the-crow-knows/580726/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook
<https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/what-the-crow-knows/580726/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook>
>> [11]
>>
>>
>
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/oct/06/anicka-yi-tate-modern-turbine-hall-commission
<https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/oct/06/anicka-yi-tate-modern-turbine-hall-commission>
>> [12]
>>
>> All best,
>>
>> George
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:44 PM Martin Doerr
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Robert,
>>
>> Having collaborated with natural history museum colleagues
for some
>> years and designed a research infrastructure for
biodiversity in
>> Greece, I understand that they normally do not describe the
actions
>> of an individual in a way that information integration on
the base
>> of the individual's animal actions would be needed. They would
>> rather state the fact that an individual of type A, showed
>> individual behavior pattern B. They would integrate these
data on a
>> type base, and not on an individual base. We have at FORTH
converted
>> Darwin Core data of occurrences of individuals into CRMsci
>> representations. That had so far covered the needs.
>>
>> A colleague in Britain had used, I think, CRM for modelling
>> observations of Caledonian Crow observations. Since these
crows do
>> not travel, the relevant information access and exchange is
still on
>> a categorical level.
>>
>> Migratory birds tracking may be an application, but
normally they do
>> not describe other behavior than move, in which case we can
use a
>> Presence construct for the migration paths.
>>
>> Our collaboration with NHM showed that they often prefer
not to use
>> CRM for their observation data. In a large European
Project, we were
>> forced to cheat and rename all CRM concepts, so that they
appeared
>> under a "BIO" title.
>>
>> So, in short, we need an expert that would show us practice of
>> modelling animal actions individually, and be willing to
consider
>> CRM...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 9:13 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>>
>> Could we clarify what sort of expert we're looking for to
move the
>> discussion forward? In particular, natural history museums
seem to
>> be at the critical intersection between CIDOC and the
activities of
>> animals. I can represent the sorts of documentary evidence
from that
>> side, and happy to reach out to colleagues at other NHMs.
So I think
>> the first aspect is covered, but I question whether we (as
modelers
>> of museum knowledge and documentation) /need/ to understand
animal
>> individuality or behavior in order to take the first step of
>> describing an animal performing some action. Conversely, my
>> experience has always been that when there is something to
react to,
>> it is much easier to engage with outside specialists. It
is easier
>> to ask for opinions on something than it is to ask them to
help come
>> up with the interdisciplinary model.
>>
>> I also don't think it makes sense to model animal actors in
great
>> detail, down to the same level as the differences between
classes in
>> CRMTex for example. The baseline that we need to start with
is much
>> simpler. If there isn't a fine grained concept of animal
>> individuality, I don't think that means we can't model an
individual
>> animal at a coarser granularity, just that we shouldn't
allow the
>> ontology to describe anything that we don't understand.
Even as a
>> non-biologist, I know without any hesitation that the bird
laid the
>> egg in the nest in the Peabody Museum of Natural History,
and that
>> the herd of dinosaurs created the footprints preserved in
Dinosaur
>> State Park up the road from us. I know that a sheepdog can herd
>> sheep and makes decisions about which way to run to
accomplish the
>> aim of getting the sheep into the next field (and when I was a
>> little lad played the part of such a sheepdog for my uncle
in New
>> Zealand). How does the sheepdog know? Does it know that it
knows? If
>> we study 100 sheepdogs individually and in groups, what do
we learn
>> about sheepdog behavior? I don't care, and I don't think
any other
>> museum oriented documentation system would either :)
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:50 AM Martin Doerr
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear George, Robert,
>>
>> This makes generally sense to me as a discussion starting
point.
>> However, I‘d like to remind you that our methodology requires
>> first a community practice of doing documentation about
such things,
>> and second domain experts for concepts that are not our primary
>> knowledge.
>>
>> To my best knowledge, there does not exist any reliable
concept of
>> what individuality means across the animal kingdom, nor what a
>> collective of such individuals is. There is an unbelievable
>> complexity to these questions. We know from experience that any
>> global widening of scope can blur all distinctions ontology
>> enginerring relies on. Therefore I'd regard it as most
important to
>> find the experts first and let them speak.
>>
>> The reasons why we did not model animal actors is precisely
the lack
>> of an experts group to communicate with.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On 10/11/2021 4:28 PM, George Bruseker wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In preparation for the discussion of non-human actors as
related to
>> use cases arising in Linked.Art (inter alia), Rob and I have
>> sketched some ideas back and forth to try to find a
monotonic was to
>> add the agency of animals in the first instance into CRM
(proceeding
>> in an empirical bottom up fashion) and then see where else
we might
>> also get added in (searching for the sibling class that Martin
>> suggests and the generalization that it would need).
>>
>> The linked sketch provides a proposal for discussion. The
background
>> is given already in this issue.
>>
>>
>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RtKBvAH1N0G8yaE_io6hU2Z8MTBmH_8-/view?usp=sharing
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RtKBvAH1N0G8yaE_io6hU2Z8MTBmH_8-/view?usp=sharing>
>> [13] (draw.io <http://draw.io> [14])
>>
>>
>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aCEBtXjW8M0W7qCGe9ozSMeYAH7tJ3Wr/view?usp=sharing
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aCEBtXjW8M0W7qCGe9ozSMeYAH7tJ3Wr/view?usp=sharing>
>> [15] (png)
>>
>> Here is some argumentation.
>>
>> Up to now, CRM takes its scope as related to documenting
intentional
>> acts of human beings. Its top level class then has been E39
Actor
>> which gives properties which allow the assigning of
responsibility
>> for an intentional activity. It has two subclasses, E21
Person and
>> E74 Group. These two kinds of being have different behaviour,
>> therefore properties, therefore classes.
>>
>> If we expand the scope (in base or in sci or wherever) to
include
>> animal agency in the first instance, then we must have a way to
>> monotonically generate this extension (we don't want to
just expand
>> the scope of E39 Actor because then we will end up with rabbits
>> being responsible for financial crises and murders and all
sorts of
>> nonsense).
>>
>> So we want to introduce a sibling class for E39 Actor. Call
this
>> biological agent. Instances can be anything biological.
This would
>> obviously be some sort of a superclass of E21 Person, since all
>> persons are biological actors as well. It would be a
subclass of
>> biological object since all biological agents must be
biological.
>> (but not all things biological are biological agents)
>>
>> Then we would want a general class that subsumes the agency of
>> purely human actors and biological agents. This would be
our top
>> class. Here we come up with a more general notion of
agency. Whereas
>> E39 Actor was declared in order to account for a 'legal persons
>> notion' of agency common to Western legal systems etc. (and is
>> perfectly adequate for the scope of CRM Base), this would be a
>> broader notion of agency.
>>
>> In order to avoid impossible philosophical arguments around
self
>> consciousness, we can give a more externalist scope note /
intension
>> to this class. Agency has to do with those entities which
display
>> self organization and action towards an end from an external
>> perspective. This way we avoid having to know if the other
really
>> has a self. If it looks like it is acting intentionally and
people
>> document it as such, then so it is.
>>
>> This now gives us a super class (and eventually super
properties)
>> for all agents.
>>
>> But wait... we need more.
>>
>> CRMBase distinguishes between persons and groups. Whereas
persons
>> must have both agency and be individuated corporeal beings,
groups
>> do not. Persons are atomic and irreducible (can't be made
up of more
>> persons, can't be spread over multiple bodies / time
zones). Groups
>> are composed of persons and groups. Groups are inherently
>> collective.
>>
>> If we wish then to have this same distinction reflected
into the
>> biological domain we would need a class for individual
biological
>> agents parallel / sibling to person and a class for collective
>> biological agents, parallel / sibling to group.
>>
>> Doing this one would then need the superclasses to subsume
these
>> divisions. Hence:
>>
>> Individual Agent: subclass of Agent, superclass of individual
>> biological agent
>>
>> Collective Agent: subclass of Agent, superclass of collective
>> biological agent and human group
>>
>> This finally allows us to have:
>>
>> Individual Biological Agent: subclass of Biological Agent and
>> Individual Agent: used for individual birds, trees, and other
>> biological actors
>>
>> Collective Biological Agent: subclass of Biological Agent and
>> Collective Agent: used for flocks, forests and other group
>> biological actors (unlike human groups, such groups are
inherently
>> corporeal)
>>
>> And at that point we might consider renaming our existing
classes to
>> 'human' xxx
>>
>> So
>>
>> E39 Human Agent: subclass of agent, no real change in
intension, the
>> kind of entity that can take action for which legal
responsibility
>> can be attributed within human cultures societies
>>
>> E21 Human Person: no real change in intension but its
superclass
>> becomes individual biological agent and human agent (ie an
animal
>> that can be held legallly responsible for its actions)
>>
>> E74 Group no real change in intension, but it gains a super
class
>> Collective Agent so it can be queried together with other agent
>> groups.
>>
>> This analysis does not get into the properties which are,
of course,
>> fundamental but sketches a possible path for creating the
structure
>> necessary to create this extension of scope in such a way
that it
>> would respect the principle of monotonicity in revising the
model
>> while allowing the growth of the model to handle the many
use cases
>> of documented animal agency that fall within CH institution's
>> documentary scope.
>>
>> Hope this is a good starting point for a constructive
discussion!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> George
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------
>> Dr. Martin Doerr
>>
>> Honorary Head of the
>>
>> Center for Cultural Informatics
>>
>> Information Systems Laboratory
>> Institute of Computer Science
>> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
>>
>> N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
>> GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
>>
>> Vox:+30(2810)391625
>> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
<http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl> [1]
>
> --
>
> Rob Sanderson
> Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata
> Yale University
>
> --
> ------------------------------------
> Dr. Martin Doerr
>
> Honorary Head of the
>
> Center for Cultural Informatics
>
> Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
>
> N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
> GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
>
> Vox:+30(2810)391625
> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
<http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl> [1]
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig> [16]
>
> --
>
> Rob Sanderson
> Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata
> Yale University
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ics.forth.gr%2Fisl&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964034138%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=o0ecAyLDntcn6tU3%2B%2F4DgFq50GBAzGW1291wi9QhdwE%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ics.forth.gr%2Fisl&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964034138%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=o0ecAyLDntcn6tU3%2B%2F4DgFq50GBAzGW1291wi9QhdwE%3D&reserved=0>
> [2] http://concordia.ca <http://concordia.ca>
> [3]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Fauthorities%2Fnames%2Fnb2015016669.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963964170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hdNSl4RqY9oAtWoVxSp3xl9fCc21yLNCKsHF8lEspgs%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Fauthorities%2Fnames%2Fnb2015016669.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963964170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hdNSl4RqY9oAtWoVxSp3xl9fCc21yLNCKsHF8lEspgs%3D&reserved=0>
> [4]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Frwo%2Fagents%2Fnb2017006372.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963964170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=0rU8nimUcSQsX0qHQI7H94Hs4w3ssLoOLPIB6fQdwBE%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Frwo%2Fagents%2Fnb2017006372.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963964170%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=0rU8nimUcSQsX0qHQI7H94Hs4w3ssLoOLPIB6fQdwBE%3D&reserved=0>
> [5]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Fauthorities%2Fnames%2Fno2017122131.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963974165%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=QEy5XUWLQMwdpq9prYdI14FzZlkBkHvWmHIUrph%2FeQo%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Fauthorities%2Fnames%2Fno2017122131.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963974165%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=QEy5XUWLQMwdpq9prYdI14FzZlkBkHvWmHIUrph%2FeQo%3D&reserved=0>
> [6]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Frwo%2Fagents%2Fn2013036964.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963974165%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=LKk%2BIU6%2B1hjIcYA9lP%2F2cGVSF%2BhegeziH4ifUrOmcz8%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fid.loc.gov%2Frwo%2Fagents%2Fn2013036964.html&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963974165%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=LKk%2BIU6%2B1hjIcYA9lP%2F2cGVSF%2BhegeziH4ifUrOmcz8%3D&reserved=0>
> [7]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.getty.edu%2Fvow%2FULANFullDisplay%3Ffind%3D%26role%3D%26nation%3D%26subjectid%3D500353456&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963984159%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=uq7x%2FB9sMhI%2Ba5WIBaE%2FYIZ1JqKCDROMhsE%2FqTHIl34%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.getty.edu%2Fvow%2FULANFullDisplay%3Ffind%3D%26role%3D%26nation%3D%26subjectid%3D500353456&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963984159%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=uq7x%2FB9sMhI%2Ba5WIBaE%2FYIZ1JqKCDROMhsE%2FqTHIl34%3D&reserved=0>
> [8]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fisni.org%2Fisni%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963984159%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=kA1elOx%2BnZrSK8z8AkvhabyJQfHsRUAY%2FpP53dqgvfI%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fisni.org%2Fisni%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963984159%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=kA1elOx%2BnZrSK8z8AkvhabyJQfHsRUAY%2FpP53dqgvfI%3D&reserved=0>
> [9]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2021%2Fsep%2F29%2Fnew-zealand-kea-can-use-touchscreens-but-cant-distinguish-between-real-and-virtual-worlds&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963994155%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=IUWEJ56BvmZ9CUxoqHfOUPH7YMtOJtB4Yq4wTI72LxE%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2021%2Fsep%2F29%2Fnew-zealand-kea-can-use-touchscreens-but-cant-distinguish-between-real-and-virtual-worlds&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963994155%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=IUWEJ56BvmZ9CUxoqHfOUPH7YMtOJtB4Yq4wTI72LxE%3D&reserved=0>
> [10]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fwatch-australias-google-delivery-drone-attacked-by-raven-mid-air-2021-9%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook.com%26utm_campaign%3Dsf-insider-inventions%26utm_medium%3Dsocial&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963994155%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=u7qMs06srq%2BXVgyFkGkEXSEeUXfY29RpAWp%2Fr8Tw%2BWQ%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fwatch-australias-google-delivery-drone-attacked-by-raven-mid-air-2021-9%3Futm_source%3Dfacebook.com%26utm_campaign%3Dsf-insider-inventions%26utm_medium%3Dsocial&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838963994155%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=u7qMs06srq%2BXVgyFkGkEXSEeUXfY29RpAWp%2Fr8Tw%2BWQ%3D&reserved=0>
> [11]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fmagazine%2Farchive%2F2019%2F03%2Fwhat-the-crow-knows%2F580726%2F%3Futm_campaign%3Dthe-atlantic%26utm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dfacebook&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964004154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hZSt7ysLRKBeyeETe%2BRmi6QlK1BQB7oLdbSVT7J6x%2FY%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Fmagazine%2Farchive%2F2019%2F03%2Fwhat-the-crow-knows%2F580726%2F%3Futm_campaign%3Dthe-atlantic%26utm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dfacebook&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964004154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hZSt7ysLRKBeyeETe%2BRmi6QlK1BQB7oLdbSVT7J6x%2FY%3D&reserved=0>
> [12]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fartanddesign%2F2021%2Foct%2F06%2Fanicka-yi-tate-modern-turbine-hall-commission&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964004154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WcnY9gdVpszxHSnK9zefRS%2BtFt0yJJrEJEWny8vUqQ8%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fartanddesign%2F2021%2Foct%2F06%2Fanicka-yi-tate-modern-turbine-hall-commission&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964004154%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=WcnY9gdVpszxHSnK9zefRS%2BtFt0yJJrEJEWny8vUqQ8%3D&reserved=0>
> [13]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1RtKBvAH1N0G8yaE_io6hU2Z8MTBmH_8-%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964014148%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=oYtVlYXC2%2BlPBV8yCkJrG6Vnf5%2BtKLxKFmd2GqOy7xA%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1RtKBvAH1N0G8yaE_io6hU2Z8MTBmH_8-%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964014148%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=oYtVlYXC2%2BlPBV8yCkJrG6Vnf5%2BtKLxKFmd2GqOy7xA%3D&reserved=0>
> [14]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdraw.io%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964024142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=vFQ2ff%2FsrgoDj9l5wadtrm79xY9tnLjCsYz%2Fzkrmnro%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdraw.io%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964024142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=vFQ2ff%2FsrgoDj9l5wadtrm79xY9tnLjCsYz%2Fzkrmnro%3D&reserved=0>
> [15]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1aCEBtXjW8M0W7qCGe9ozSMeYAH7tJ3Wr%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964024142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=PBU4cmiPCPHIwtRHrFLJPESTKnxyiT6BNUnAxl2RCvU%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1aCEBtXjW8M0W7qCGe9ozSMeYAH7tJ3Wr%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964024142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=PBU4cmiPCPHIwtRHrFLJPESTKnxyiT6BNUnAxl2RCvU%3D&reserved=0>
> [16]
>
https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ics.forth.gr%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcrm-sig&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964044131%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=SHxfxsqdh5weZGetloicBmguvo1oTGPu3iJyDtjxIhc%3D&reserved=0
<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ics.forth.gr%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcrm-sig&data=04%7C01%7Cpat.riva%40concordia.ca%7Cc79309f39b794e1f071208d98cfc5da8%7C5569f185d22f4e139850ce5b1abcd2e8%7C0%7C0%7C637695838964044131%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=SHxfxsqdh5weZGetloicBmguvo1oTGPu3iJyDtjxIhc%3D&reserved=0>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
--
*Philippe Michon*
(he/il – https://name.pn/philippe-michon
<https://name.pn/philippe-michon>)**
Semantic Web Analyst
Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN)
Department of Canadian Heritage, Government of Canada
1030 Innes Road, Ottawa (Ontario) K1B 4S7
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: 613-998-3721 ext. 225 or 1-800-520-2446
Analyste en web sémantique
Réseau canadien d'information sur le patrimoine (RCIP)
Ministère du Patrimoine canadien, Gouvernement du Canada
1030 chemin Innes, Ottawa (Ontario), K1B 4S7
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Tél. : 613-998-3721 poste 225 ou 1-800-520-2446
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
