Vielen Dank für die Nachricht!

Ich bin am ersten Werktag nach dem 15.04. wieder erreichbar. Die Nachricht wird 
nicht weitergeleitet.

Mit besten Grüßen
Zoe Schubert

Am 24.03.2022 um 13:47 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig <[email protected]>:

> I think this is a good idea!
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 3/24/2022 1:23 PM, Pavlos Fafalios via Crm-sig wrote:
> Dear George, all,
> 
> The new version of PC classes file (for CRMbase version 7.1.1) has been 
> already produced (as discussed in the last meeting) and will be soon 
> available through the crm website (see issue 567). 
> 
> Thinking of it again:  
> Since the namespace for the PC classes is the same with that of the base 
> classes/properties, why not including them directly within the base RDFS? 
> (i.e. providing at the end a single rdfs file that also includes the PCs). 
> Properties of properties are part of the official documentation (of the base 
> model, or of an extension), so why not including the corresponding PC classes 
> in the same RDFS file instead of providing and maintaining a second file? 
> (this applies for both the base model and the extensions)
> 
> This is just a suggestion without knowing any discussions, or decisions made, 
> when implementing the PC classes for the first time several years ago (there 
> might be a good reason for having a second file...). 
> 
> Best regards,
> Pavlos 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:41 AM George Bruseker via Crm-sig 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Subsequent to another thread I started here I am proposing that there be a 
> conversation about having a standard policy and method for creating, 
> documenting and making available the .1 properties for base and its 
> extensions in the RDF serialization. At present to my knowledge the PC 
> classes are only available for CRMBase and relative to version 6.2.1. Other 
> extensions however also use .1 constructions and, moreover, CRMbase moves 
> forward and its PC classes should hypothetically move with it. Therefore, I 
> propose we discuss, create and implement a common policy for creating this 
> rdf derivative to support rdf implementations that adopt the .1 constructions.
> 
> Best,
> 
> George
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pavlos Fafalios
> 
> Postdoctoral researcher (Marie Curie IF - Project ReKnow)
> Centre for Cultural Informatics & Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science - FORTH
>    
> and
> 
> Visiting Lecturer
> Department of Management Science & Technology
> Hellenic Mediterranean University
> 
> Address: N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013 Heraklion, Greece
> Email: [email protected] 
> Tel: +30-2810-391619 
> Web: http://users.ics.forth.gr/~fafalios/ 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr
>               
>  Honorary Head of the                                                         
>           
>  Center for Cultural Informatics
>  
>  Information Systems Laboratory  
>  Institute of Computer Science             
>  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   
>                   
>  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,         
>  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece 
>  
>  Vox:+30(2810)391625  
>  Email: [email protected]  
>  Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to