Dear All,

Here my first go:

*OLD*

*O13 triggers (is triggered by)***

Domain:

E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event

Range:

E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event

Quantification:

many to many (0,n:0,n)

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction between events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target system that is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an unstable mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or earthquake. In that sense the triggering event is interpreted as a cause. However, the association of the two events is based on their temporal proximity, with the triggering event ending when the triggered event starts.

Examples:

The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 /triggered/the rotational landslide that was observed along the roadon the same day. (fictitious)

The explosionat the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain) /triggered////the /rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007 (Vilajosana et al., 2008).

The 1966 flood in Florence /triggered/ mould growth on books stored in flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)

In First Order Logic:

O13(x,y) ⇒E5(x)

O13(x,y) ⇒E5(y)

O13(x,y) ⇒P182(x,y)

*NEW*

*O13 triggered (was triggered by)***

Domain:

E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event

Range:

E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event

Quantification:

many to many (0,n:0,n)

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction between events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target system that is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an unstable mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or earthquake.

The distinction of the triggering event from the triggered one lies in their difference of nature: The starting of the triggered event is the result of an interaction of constituents with the triggering one, but not a continuation of the kinds of processes of the latter. Therefore the triggering event must spatiotemporally overlap with the initial time and area of the triggered event, and the spreading out of the subsequent phenomena must initiate from this area and time and not from multiple independent areas.

Examples:

The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 /triggered/the rotational landslide that was observed along the roadon the same day. (fictitious)

The explosionat the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain) /triggered////the /rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007 (Vilajosana et al., 2008).

The 1966 flood in Florence /triggered/ mould growth on books stored in flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)

In First Order Logic:

O13(x,y) ⇒E5(x)

O13(x,y) ⇒E5(y)


**Best,

Martin*
*




--
------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
 Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625 Email:[email protected] Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to