Dear All,
Here my first go:
*OLD*
*O13 triggers (is triggered by)***
Domain:
E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event
Range:
E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event
Quantification:
many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:
This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another
instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction
between events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target
system that is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an
unstable mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or
earthquake. In that sense the triggering event is interpreted as a
cause. However, the association of the two events is based on their
temporal proximity, with the triggering event ending when the triggered
event starts.
Examples:
The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 /triggered/the rotational landslide
that was observed along the roadon the same day. (fictitious)
The explosionat the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain)
/triggered////the /rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007
(Vilajosana et al., 2008).
The 1966 flood in Florence /triggered/ mould growth on books stored in
flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)
In First Order Logic:
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(x)
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(y)
O13(x,y) ⇒P182(x,y)
*NEW*
*O13 triggered (was triggered by)***
Domain:
E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event
Range:
E5 <#_E2_Temporal_Entity>Event
Quantification:
many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:
This property associates an instance of E5 Event that triggers another
instance of E5 Event with the latter. It identifies the interaction
between events: an event can activate (trigger) other events in a target
system that is in a situation of sustained tension, such as a trap or an
unstable mountain slope giving way to a land slide after a rain or
earthquake.
The distinction of the triggering event from the triggered one lies in
their difference of nature: The starting of the triggered event is the
result of an interaction of constituents with the triggering one, but
not a continuation of the kinds of processes of the latter. Therefore
the triggering event must spatiotemporally overlap with the initial time
and area of the triggered event, and the spreading out of the subsequent
phenomena must initiate from this area and time and not from multiple
independent areas.
Examples:
The earthquake of Parnitha in 1999 /triggered/the rotational landslide
that was observed along the roadon the same day. (fictitious)
The explosionat the Montserrat massif in 2007 (near Barcelona, Spain)
/triggered////the /rock fall event happened on 14 February 2007
(Vilajosana et al., 2008).
The 1966 flood in Florence /triggered/ mould growth on books stored in
flooded library rooms (Rubinstein, N., 1966)
In First Order Logic:
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(x)
O13(x,y) ⇒E5(y)
**Best,
Martin*
*
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email:[email protected]
Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig