We were following the rule that a property declared in an extension must have its domain in the extension when reading in the normal direction. The range can be in CRMbase. Is it true this is the rule?
The inverse does seem more natural in the examples but maybe not in the way the property instances would be constructed. Pat Riva Interim University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 3:06 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member) Attention This email originates from outside the concordia.ca domain. // Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du domaine de concordia.ca Question about the direction: R10 is member of (has member): Domain: F1 Work Range: E28 Conceptual Object In all the examples the inverse is used. What is the motivation for the direction in the declaration? Best, Christian-Emil ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig <[email protected]> Sent: 29 July 2023 23:17 To: CRM-SIG; Pat Riva Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member) Hello all, Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm extending the deadline to Sunday August 20. That is the beginning of the IFLA congress where the BCM Review Group meeting will be held and we will be bringing LRMoo for their approval. Thanks, Pat Pat Riva Interim University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 6:20 PM To: CRM-SIG <[email protected]> Subject: [Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member) Attention This email originates from outside the concordia.ca domain. // Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du domaine de concordia.ca Hello all, I am calling for an e-vote relating to LRMoo. Please vote on the list by July 26th. Background: At the end of SIG meeting #55 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a sketch of a new approach to R10 after the proposal made at the meeting<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UlVMIea5BHoFd8SJGaTNUvC64YpyGFmyahRO0VBkT5U/edit> was considered insufficient. This was received with interest but there was not time to discuss a full proposal. This e-vote is to approve the redefinition of R10, and the consequences on R67 (which was originally a subproperty of R10). Please see the proposed new text in this Google doc (E-vote: R10<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yOHjkIo_FW1_x85zYNJbaOrGT3PRizjxcn4ZGPjLuQI/edit>). Thanks, Pat Pat Riva Interim University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
