On Thu, Jul 26, 2012, Alexander Graf wrote: > It might however be an interesting idea to have a similar split to > coreboot / tianocore in the u-boot world. U-boot could still be the > bit implementing the initial initialization and maybe even device > i/o drivers, while a uefi capable payload could then implement all > the uefi layering on top. Then we could either load Linux directly > from u-boot like we do today, or bootstrap outselves into a uefi > implementation that would allow for generic booting across the > board.
Exactly; my point about an UEFI boot cmd in U-Boot was to try to store this UEFI-implementing payload in an UEFI-compatible place itself as much as possible, and then have U-Boot discover it. It's a bit chicken-and-egg though :-) -- Loïc Minier _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
