uEnv.txt and boot.scr aren't the same thing. uEnv.txt is the U-Boot environment usually on a fat partition. boot.scr is loaded by a readily loaded environment... You either predefined your environment and boot from it or you're using values from that environment. I wouldn't use uEnv.txt to replace a boot.scr on any system..
Matt Sealey <[email protected]> Product Development Analyst, Genesi USA, Inc. On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/08/2012 11:30 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> Standardizing on boot.scr vs. raw text file for scripts would also help. >> Right >> now, ubuntu uses the former and fedora the later. > > Not sure what you mean here- boot.scr vs uEnv.txt perhaps? In Fedora we use > uEnv.txt where the uboot binary supports it (OMAP for instance), but > otherwise boot.scr. If we were going to standardize these things I'd liek to > see: > > Move to uEnv.txt instead of boot.scr > > Make zboot standard > > Make hush shell standard > > -- > Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > cross-distro mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
