On 09/17/2012 06:24 AM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Jon Masters [2012-09-16 21:34 -0400]: >> On 09/13/2012 01:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:39:20PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jon Masters wrote: >>>>>> I propose the following triplet for Fedora on AArch64: >>>>>> >>>>>> aarch64-redhat-linux-gnu >>>>>> >>>>>> Skipping the vendor part, that means generally: >>>>>> >>>>>> aarch64-linux-gnu >>>>>> >>>>>> There should be no reason to deviate from this. I'm putting it out there >>>>>> now >>>>>> because I don't want another ARMv7 experience later :) >>>>> >>>>> unless you're doing big endian then it's: >>>>> aarch64_be-linux-gnu >>>> >>>> In discussions with various folks, it seems that none of the distros >>>> are particularly interested in BE. \o/ >>> >>> i was just more nettling Jon ;) >> >> Always fun. Note that just because we agree on the triplet, doesn't mean >> that we've yet had the fun of discussing the linker path until we pass >> out form sheer exhaustion. So, let's have that one out before some of us >> go doing our own thing. From my point of view, we don't care /at all/ >> about multi-arch and certainly I have no plans of even supporting a >> 32-bit ARM userspace on AArch64 (if you want that, use virtualization). >> Sure, the latter is aspirational and someone will ruin it, so maybe we >> need to go to /lib64 rather than /lib (I don't want to). > > Or do it properly with multiarch: :-) > /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu > /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf
Forgive my sarcasm. Perhaps not everyone sees I'm just messing with you over the multi-arch thing. To each his own as long as we agree on the linker path :) Thanks for the informative response Wookey :) Jon. _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
