On 7 October 2013 13:08, Anil Singhar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Thanks for your response. I prepared the mksh test and ran them. There were > 5 failures (out of the 436 tests) as follows.
Well done! 4 of those 5 are listed in the output as ignored. > Right now, I don't know if > these are failures due to klibc implementation or due to problems with the > way I have build mksh itself. To some extent I suspect mksh as well because > (i) I could not get mksh_44 (from this link: dget > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mksh/mksh_44-1.dsc , the link > seems to be broken) Since I started on this (and got that link), mksh has been updated. You can get 44-1.dsc from snapshot.debian.org: http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20130305T212453Z/pool/main/m/mksh/mksh_44-1.dsc > but I used whatever I got ( mksh_44.orig.tar.gz , this > may be missing some patches, how to get that.. ).(ii) While building mksh, > encountered some compiler errors (e.g. conftest.c) but the building seemed > to go fine despite these errors, so I went ahead with testing and ended up > with 5 failures out of which mksh ignores 4 and didn't expect 1 as it > reports. > > So, do you have any idea if I am doing the right thing..? I think you've done the right thing. > Should I worry > about getting mksh build without any compiler error or warning first before > attempting to use the tests..? Compare with the Debian build log for 44-1: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mksh&arch=amd64&ver=44-1&stamp=1363807013 There's a different failure there. I think this is ready to take to klibc upstream, let them decide on the mksh test results. -- Neil Williams ============= [email protected] http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
