On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:33:28PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On 22 May 2014 17:47, Ian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Isn't most of this stuff hidden in the boot.scr and/or extlinux.conf or > whatever anyway? What is the mechanism by which a standardised location > for the DTB files becomes necessary? > > There is really nothing that makes it "necessary" - it simply a > convenience for users and tool writers that regardless of distribution, > they can find the device tree files from same place. > Back to track, it Seems everyone agrees in putting dtbs under /boot. The > kernel make install location /boot/dtbs/$(uname -r)/ has been preferred > (Alex, Paolo), with the other candidate being the fedora location > /boot/dtb-$uname -r)/.
can we reach a conclusion on this? is it ok for everyone if we settle on /boot/dtb being a symlink to a distribution dependent location (e.g. /boot/dtbs/$(uname -r) or /boot/dtb-$(uname -r))? -- bye, p. _______________________________________________ cross-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
