On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (Sent to cross-distro with debian-arm on cc.)
>
> We have an 'interesting' situation ahead of us, or indeed some of us
> have already fallen into it:
>
> ARM64 platforms with > 512GB between the lowest and highest RAM
> addresses end up getting their amount of usable memory truncated if
> the kernel is built for 39-bit VA (which is what currently happens for
> Debian kernels). For 4.7, the arm64 defconfig was changed to enable
> 48-bit VA by default.
>
> While itself not a critical error (but really annoying), in
> combination with GRUB putting the initrd near the top of available
> RAM, we end up with systems not booting. We think we've also seen
> issues with ACPI tables above this waterline.
>
> Simple - all we need to do then is enable 48-bit VA in the arm64
> kernel config? Well, yes. I know Fedora are already doing this, and I
> have raised a bug[1] for Debian to do the same.
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834505
>
> The problem is - some pieces of software have had time to be written
> in a ... let's charitably call it a "focused on amd64" fasion ... with
> the embedded assumption that anything above virtual address bit 44 is
> a pointer-tag free-for-all.
>
> On the Debian-ish side, we're coming up on both Ubuntu 16.10 and the
> freeze for Stretch, leaving a pretty short window to resolve this
> unholy kernel->initrd->userland triangle.
>
> The applications we know are affected are luajit and mozjs (libv8 is
> not a problem). But this has a follow-on cost: both of these are used
> by other packages. Other jit/runtime packages could have their own
> issues.
>
> The mozjs bug is fixed on trunk, and will hopefully make it into
> release 49[2], but it remains to be seen if that's too late for some
> distributions.
>
> [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143022
>
> For luajit, I'm told this has been fixed on 2.1 branch, but not merged
> to master?
>
> Now, Jeremy (cc:d) tells me the list of currently-known Fedora
> packages affected by this are:
> couchdb
> elinks
> erlang-js
> freewrl
> libEAI
> libproxy-mozjs
> mediatomb
> pacrunner
> plowshare
> polkit
> cinnamon
> cjs
> cjs
> cjs-tests
> gjs
> gjs
> gjs-tests
> gnome-shell
> 0ad
> mongodb
> mongodb-server
>
> Some of these may only need an updated luajit/mozjs package, but some
> may need more invasive changes.

Actually that list doesn't include any luajit based packages in Fedora
because there's not, upstreamed at least, support for aarch64 in
luajit as yet.

Peter
_______________________________________________
cross-distro mailing list
cross-distro@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro

Reply via email to