Justin R. Knierim wrote:
I'm not so sure about the "then when there *is* something pertaining to development asked, it goes ignored" as I haven't seen this. Looking through the archives, I see most emails answered. Although the spam and virus emails which almost outnumber the real emails nowadays might have hidden something.
I've counted 9 emails that, in the last 2 weeks or so got no response at all.
As for the change to the new glibc and gcc, it has been in Trac as a bug sent to the cross-lfs list over a month ago. It is not like LFS where tickets go to lfs-book where they are somewhat hidden, on cross-lfs it is all there. Jim, Ryan, Joe and Chris all commented on the tickets, so I don't know what else there is to discuss. It is just my opinion, but emailing the list to say "I'm adding glibc-2.4 to the book" is redundant when there is the open ticket. If jim had problems (which judging by
I wasn't disputing the adding of glibc-2.4. All I wanted to know is why cross-tools/glibc.xml was removed for sparc64. This has been answered, so that's that.
-- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-lfs FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
