David, no problem. We know the rules. Anyway, I can blame it on hudson :-). Onward to M4...
Greg On Nov 10, 2011, at 11:52 AM, David M Williams wrote: > > I managed to get a build done this morning, just in case you happen to run > > the aggregation again. :-) > > Just to be explicit, we (me and Markus) decided not to respin to pick this > up. While its true the EPP packages are still spinning, we are getting "late > in the day" and feared "Murphey's law", there is always something (else) that > could go wrong (even unrelated to PTP) so we are hoping the packages > currently spinning will be it. Sorry we couldn't be accommodating, I will > turn aggregation back on Friday, and promote a new staging repo of all looks > ok, thus providing a very early M4 staging repo, if that helps in your > testing. > > Thanks, > > > > > <graycol.gif>Greg Watson ---11/10/2011 07:52:21 AM---I managed to get a build > done this morning, just in case you happen to run the aggregation again. :- > > From: Greg Watson <[email protected]> > To: Cross project issues <[email protected]>, > Date: 11/10/2011 07:52 AM > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Done with Juno M3 staging repo > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > I managed to get a build done this morning, just in case you happen to run > the aggregation again. :-) > > Greg > > On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Greg Watson wrote: > > > No luck with the PTP build so far, so we're fine if you want to call it > > done. Hopefully we'll have this sorted out for M4. > > > > Greg > > > > On Nov 9, 2011, at 5:22 PM, David M Williams wrote: > > > >> > >> 5 PM, M3 +3 day, I'm assuming everyone wanting to has gotten in their M3 > >> contributions, since I've not heard any explicit "wait ... " messages. > >> (But, admit, kind of hard to tell with the many Hudson problems ... so, if > >> someone meant to say they'd be late due to Hudson issues, please say so. > >> I think we could still accommodate one more aggregation build, if done in > >> next couple of hours.) If I don't hear anything by 7 PM Eastern, I will > >> assume no requests coming. > >> > >> There are only a few projects with disabled features or repositories, so > >> thanks to every one else "getting on board". > >> > >> equinox.b3aggrcon (4 matches) > >> mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon > >> rap.b3aggrcon > >> scout.b3aggrcon > >> windowbuilder.b3aggrcon > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
