On 12/14/2011 11:46 AM, Eike Stepper wrote: > Am 14.12.2011 15:50, schrieb Denis Roy: >> A) The issues were specifically tied to wiping the workspace. >> Accessing the files was not a problem. > > Would that mean that the new filesystem local to Hudson could still be > shared via NFS from there Perhaps... But Ugh, the nastiness of having a spaghetti of shares which all refer to each other. There has to be an easier way.
> so that our scripts (that are hacks anyway to work around the > limitation that Hudson can not write to download.e.o) This is what I'm trying to get a better grasp of. But again, this is no secret: If you feel the limitation is too complex, feel free to allow Hudson to write to download.e.o. Many projects are doing it. Denis _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
