Am 14.12.11 20:17, schrieb Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo:
> I actually thought that the "milestones" repository was the ideal
> candidate, in this case. 
I don't think that "milestones" is the ideal candidate for downstream
projects.
At least not after the latest RC, which will be rebuild as release in
the most cases.
So you have to switch to releases update site, to build against the
final version of projects you depends on.
Anyway, if you as e.g +3 project operate against the juno
aggregation/staging repository,
you can be sure, you get the right +2 dependencies for each
milestone/release.

> In fact, it's not a problem of having different
> timing in the releases dates, but the different repositories in which the
> different releases are placed.... Perhaps a simply (temporal) redirection
> from the "milestones" composite repository to the new released stuff would
> have sufficed in this case.... It's much easier make the releng of a
> project configure the repositories that he/she controls than making the
> releng of the downstream projects look into such an issue.
I think it's also a good idea to point b3 aggregator to projects nightly
update site after a milestone is released.
So dependent projects can earlier react to probably breaking changes.

Regards,
Dennis.

>
> Cheers,
> Adolfo.
> 2011/12/14 Miles Parker <milespar...@gmail.com>
>
>> I had thought last year that this was what aggregator was for, that is
>> that we could use the update sites indicated in the aggregator, but I
>> discovered that I was wrong. Perhaps we should legislate having that be in
>> sync, or add a separate set for Interim and Nightlies?It sure would be nice
>> to find out what version of dependencies we should be using without having
>> to consult typically out of date project web sites.
>>
>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:53 AM, John Arthorne wrote:
>>
>> The general form of this question would be good input for Wayne and his
>> project page organization. Currently projects declare with a flag that they
>> are participating in the simultaneous release, but there is no record that
>> I am aware of indicating which release they will contribute. For projects
>> whose own schedule matches the cadence of the release train this is fairly
>> obvious. But for other projects with more frequent releases I don't think
>> this information is available. To pick a random example, this morning I was
>> asking what release of Jetty would be in Juno and the answer wasn't so
>> clear. Maybe the juno "participation" flag should be metadata on a release
>> rather than just a generic flag on the project? For downstream projects and
>> consumers I expect this information would be really helpful.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  *Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo <adolfo...@opencanarias.com>*
>> Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
>>
>> 12/14/2011 10:20 AM
>>  Please respond to
>> Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>
>>   To
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> cc
>>   Subject
>> [cross-project-issues-dev] Xtext M4 ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Folks
>>
>> I'm wondering if Xtext guys are going to create any kind of milestone for
>> M4.
>>
>> Looking at their milestones repository[1] I only see an old 2.1.0M2.
>>
>> I don't find any clue in the project plan [2] neither .
>>
>> Any reason about why there is no an updated milestones repository would be
>> appreciated. Take into account that our milestones builds are based on
>> milestones repositories for those projects we depend on, so keeping the
>> usual (probably planned) milestones releases are important for us.
>>
>> [1] 
>> *http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/milestones*<http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/tmf/xtext/updates/milestones>
>> [2] *
>> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=modeling.tmf.xtext
>> *<http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=modeling.tmf.xtext>
>>
>> P.S: I've not checked other itemis projects (xpand, mwe), but I guess we
>> will have the same problem with them.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Adolfo._______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


-- 
Dennis Hübner

Softwareentwickler

Mobil:   0151 173 96 707

http://www.itemis.de/

itemis AG
Am Germaniahafen 1
24143 Kiel

Rechtlicher Hinweis:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621
Vorstand: Wolfgang Neuhaus, Jens Wagener, Dr. Georg Pietrek
Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael 
Neuhaus 

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to