On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Denis Roy wrote: > > Issue 3: > I'm preparing to install a Hudson slave on the two IBM POWER servers at > the OSUOSL. These remote slaves will not have access to /shared and > will not have signing capabilities (at least not initially). We will, > however, install all the required build tools locally and these monster > boxes will be perfect for huge build jobs and tests. In setting these > slaves up, am I correct in assuming your jobs are modular enough to take > advantage of remote server cycles without access to /shared and signing?
Yes, PTP has some jobs that could take advantage of this. Regards, Greg _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
