On 02/09/2012 05:39 PM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Was the addition of slave6 announced somewhere ?
Apparently even addition of a new slave has potential for odd behavior and
breaking things. As we have seen, advance notice of _any_ modification to
Hudson would be helpful
Yes, it was announced, and we did our homework -- we configured it so
that jobs must be explicitly tied to them so that we can work out the
kinks. slave5 is still configured that way since we haven't worked out
all the kinks associated with the fact it's an IA64 slave.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg07116.html
I apologize if such announcements were made and I've been missing them ...
Denis
Thanks
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Denis Roy
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson changes
On 02/09/2012 11:46 AM, Greg Watson wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Greg Watson wrote:
Has something changed on hudson? Our builds, which were previously working
fine, are now failing because /usr/local/bin/java can't be found.
Thanks,
Greg
It magically started working again.
Greg
We were missing a symlinnk on the new hudson-slave6, and I added it last night
after you posted this.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
