Denis,
Let us not move the job. The fix I put in hudson-test-harness (reducing
foot print of JUnit Tests) should save lot more than this job. I request
a restart during this week end and do some more heap analysis early next
week.
- Winston
On 2/23/12 7:26 AM, Denis Roy wrote:
On 02/23/2012 09:59 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
When it is done, I'd be glad to have feedback on the overall
performance benefit of moving just one job. It's just saving 100MB on
a 2GB JVM. If nothing changed, then I'll annoy to get job is back on
hudson.eclipse.org.
The background for all this is bug 367238. It is called "improve
Hudson stability and performance" and it is marked "critical". I've
put a number of bugs as dependencies to that bug. As I've mentioned,
closing only one of the blockers will not fix the issue, but when a
job consumes 10x the amount of RAM of other jobs, it is clearly
misbehaving.
Let's resume this discussion on the appropriate bugs. Thanks.
Denis
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
