Hi Miles,

I checked the ATL update site and all seems ok to me, both http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/atl/updates/milestones/3.3/ and http://download.eclipse.org/releases/staging/ shows ATL M7 build and its installation works.

William

Le 10/05/2012 02:56, Miles Parker a écrit :

Hi,

FWIW, I couldn't get the M2M ATL entry (http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/m2m/atl/updates/milestones/3.3/) and it broke, reporting missing repos. Reverting wpiers' change so that it uses 3.2 instead works, but I'm sure that's not what's intended. Don't know what's going on here or if this is showing up in actual build but I thought I'd mention it.

(And yes, my ssh does work, thanks Denis. Now I'm waiting on build to complete and may need further tweaks. David, please do not wait on me, but I'll re-enable and commit IIF I can get a clean local validation here.)

-Miles

On 2012-05-09, at 9:18 AM, Borislav Kapukaranov wrote:

Hey David,

I just successfully validated the virgo.b3aggrcon and enabled it. We don't have new content for this milestone but I updated the references to Equinox.

Best Regards
Bobby

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Doug Schaefer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    CDT is scrambling to fix some major issues. We may ask for more
    time. Hopefully not.

    Thanks,
    Doug

    From: David M Williams <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Reply-To: Cross project issues
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Date: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 12:11 PM

    To: Cross project issues <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7

    Reminder ... it is +3 day! 5 PM this evening (Eastern) will be
    "cut-off" unless someone asks for a few extra hours.

    I removed the emf compare feature from modeling category, since
    it was cause build to fail. If there is some other one that's
    supposed to be there, please add it back.

    The following still have disabled repositories or features:

    amp.b3aggrcon
    equinox.b3aggrcon
    jetty.b3aggrcon
    mft.b3aggrcon
    riena.b3aggrcon
    virgo.b3aggrcon

    Any word?

    I can speak to the equinox one. See bug 378735[1]. It is related
    to the org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id
    <http://org.eclipse.rcp.sdk.id/> "product".  I _think_ I can add
    it back for RC1. But is anyone using it? Can anyone document a
    use case? It has not been working/available for all of Juno, so
    far, and no one has really complained, and no one seems to have a
    clear id of if or why its needed.
    So, I know it'd be short notice to remove it ... but ... would
    also appreciate someone clearly saying why its needed.

    [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=378735


    <graycol.gif>David M Williams---05/09/2012 10:45:14 AM---Thanks
    for replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be current
    aggregation builds are failing ou

    From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, Cross
    project issues <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>,
    Date: 05/09/2012 10:45 AM
    Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
    Sent by: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Thanks for replying. But, I'm a little confused, as the be
    current aggregation builds are failing out-of-the-gate saying
    there is a problem with the model, at the emf.compare in the
    "modeling category" does not refer to the right one. And,
    apparently comes from several sources? (at least in past?) so ...
    is there supposed to be _any_ emf.compare in Juno? Or is it
    completely gone? If the later, I'll just remove it from the
    category. If the the former ... I'll have to hunt around for
    which is "the right one" and use it (so, hoping someone knows off
    the top of their head).

    FYI, this can be seen by using the b3 aggregator editor,
    selecting the top level "aggregation" note, and then running the
    "validate" command from context menu. (Not even "validate
    aggregation", just "validate" which just validates the XML and
    EMF model).

    Thanks,


    Inactive hide details for Laurent Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33
    AM---Hi, Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot
    oLaurent Goubet ---05/09/2012 09:02:33 AM---Hi, Sorry about the
    delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays here :).

    From: Laurent Goubet <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    To: Cross project issues <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>,
    Date: 05/09/2012 09:02 AM
    Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
    Sent by: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Hi,

    Sorry about the delay before replying, May has a lot of holidays
    here :).

    emf-compare.b3aggrcon indeed had one repository "disabled"...
    that was only a leftover from a previous milestone and did not
    impact M7. We've removed that repository from the file.

    Laurent Goubet
    Obeo

    On 06/05/2012 21:38, David M Williams wrote:


        Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status!

        First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2
        primary build from the Eclipse Project, so for the first time
        we have a pure and correct 4.2 repo. In the past, some things
        from 3.8 were "slipping in" through aggregation due to the
        way the platform was producing and partially (unknowingly)
        combining 3.8 and 4.2. But no more, 4.2 only.

        One impact of this, is the bundle
        'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no longer available ... it
        was actually removed in 4.1, but it is being left in the 3.x
        stream, even though 3.8 does not use it. It now correctly
        does _not_ show up in 4.2 repo via aggregation.

        And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled that, which rippled
        across 3 or 4 others that depend on BIRT charting.
        I hope BIRT can live without that old bundle and use the
        jetty server now provided by the platform (and used by the
        help system, in both 3.8 and 4.2). _
        
__http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/plain/bundles/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/porting/4.2/incompatibilities.html?h=R4_HEAD#help-appserver_

        Then there were the (fairly) usual breakages in RAP runtime
        and Virgo based on assumptions on certain platform specific
        versions, so I disabled those to get a green build, and
        promote an initial M7 version to staging. Be sure to check
        the reports (based on staging) to get as much cleaned up as
        possible before M7: _
        __http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/_

        In all, the following files have disabled repositories or
        features. It looks worse than it is, but we need to get in
        completely "enabled" in the next few days (or, remove it, if
        its some old thing that should not even be there any longer).

        amp.b3aggrcon
        birt.b3aggrcon
        emf-compare.b3aggrcon
        equinox.b3aggrcon
        jetty.b3aggrcon
        linuxtools.b3aggrcon
        mat.b3aggrcon
        mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon
        mft.b3aggrcon
        rap.b3aggrcon
        riena.b3aggrcon
        scout.b3aggrcon
        virgo.b3aggrcon

        As always questions and clarifications are welcome.

        Thanks everyone,


        _______________________________________________
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list_
        [email protected]_
        <mailto:[email protected]>_
        __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_


    [attachment "laurent_goubet.vcf" deleted by David M
    Williams/Raleigh/IBM] _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>_
    __https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev_
    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

______________________________
Miles T. Parker
Senior Engineer and Product Manager, Tasktop
http://tasktop.com
Committer, Eclipse Mylyn and Virgo
Project Lead, Model Focussing Tools and AMP
http://milesparker.blogspot.com
skype: milestravisparker





_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

<<attachment: william_piers.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to