Hi, Just to shed some lights into the issue. Gyrex requires Gemini JPA for its EclipseLink JPA integration. Gemini JPA does not provide a p2 repository. Thus, it's in the Gyrex repo which is part of Juno.
Any ideas how to proceed? Migrating to some external library just because Gemini isn't participating in Juno seems wrong to me. -Gunnar Am 06.06.2012 15:48, schrieb Thomas Watson: > I don't know anything about why gemini.jpa or gef3d are getting added to > the repo, but this made me think about your question: > > "If these bundles are in the repository, shouldn't the owning projects > be Juno particpants?" > > I don't know the correct answer, but it strikes me as odd that we allow > non-eclipse third party dependencies to be added to the repo, but when > it comes to a dependency on another project's bundles we force the other > owning project to participate fully in the release. What if the project > does not want to participate? What if there is an IP acceptable > alternative (non-eclipse) project that could be used? Would we prefer > the use of that non-eclipse third party technology over the eclipse one > simple because the owning eclipse project does not want to participate > in the Juno release? It seems to me that such cases should be treated > as any other third party dependency and we should not force the owning > project to participate in the release. > > Tom > > > > Inactive hide details for Wayne Beaton ---06/06/2012 08:17:55 AM---Hey > folks. I'm going through the layout and licenses reportsWayne Beaton > ---06/06/2012 08:17:55 AM---Hey folks. I'm going through the layout and > licenses reports today. > > > From: > > > Wayne Beaton <wa...@eclipse.org> > > To: > > > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, > > Date: > > > 06/06/2012 08:17 AM > > Subject: > > > [cross-project-issues-dev] Layout and licenses > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Hey folks. I'm going through the layout and licenses reports today. > > I've already opened a couple of bugs regarding missing about files and > am just starting into the licenses. These issues need to be addressed > before any reviews can be declared successful. Note that these are very > basic requirements that are independent of participation in the > simultaneous release. If you need help, please ask. > > There a Gemini JPA bundle in the repository. I'm also seeing a GEF3D > bundle. Why? If these bundles are in the repository, shouldn't the > owning projects be Juno particpants? Or did I miss a memo? > > org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.0.99.v20120225-1927.jar > org.eclipse.gef3d_0.8.1.v20120528-0244.jar > > Who owns these bundles: > > org.eclipse.rephraserengine.core_8.0.0.201205300709.jar > org.eclipse.rephraserengine.ui_8.0.0.201205300709.jar > > (I'll guess tools.ptp.photran based on the version number). > > Wayne > -- > Wayne Beaton > The Eclipse Foundation > Twitter: @waynebeaton > Explore _Eclipse Projects_ > <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>_______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev