Back to someone's earlier question, yes, for me this is a bit of a silent 
protest. CDT has never contributed to an M1 build. We're too busy with 
vacations or working on SR-1 of the previous release. That was fine because we 
were always enabled and picked up the final bits from the previous release. I'm 
not pleased by this, and yes it's late, but then that's why it shouldn't have 
been done to begin with (not so silent any more ;).

:D

From: <Oberhuber>, Martin 
<martin.oberhu...@windriver.com<mailto:martin.oberhu...@windriver.com>>
Reply-To: Cross project issues 
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Date: Wednesday, 22 August, 2012 9:17 AM
To: Cross project issues 
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and readiness for Kepler M1

In fact I’ve enjoyed my vacation not checking Eclipse mailing lists recently :)

I’m going to enable the tm.b3aggrcon and tcf.b3aggrcon as soon as my SSH access 
to Eclipse.org is back
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=387782

Martin


From: 
cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org>
 [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of David M 
Williams
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:10 AM
To: 
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and readiness for Kepler M1

Still 26 projects not enabled for Kepler M1.

Can some one explain to me what this is about? Some passive aggressive protest? 
Too many people take vacation all summer and don't even check Eclipse mailing 
lists?
Are projects just indecisive and think a commitment now means it is a written 
in stone promise (which is never the case).
I know one or two people have mentioned they have special problems that will 
likely prevent participation in M1, but,
If I hear nothing, I'll assume the remaining 24 or so are dropping out, and 
will remove those files from the 'master'  branch.
For those projects to rejoin later will take an exception since there's a 
requirement for those participating to "keep participating" or else inform us 
all you no longer plan to.
The M4 deadline only applies to branch new projects, others (in previous 
release) expected to be in M1.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Requirements#Integrate_Early_and_Often

I should emphasize, if people do not want to be in sim. release, that's fine. 
It is a voluntary choice, and does take some amount of extra work. So, it 
doesn't mean you are a "bad project" or anything if you decide not to.
But, it is only common courtesy to keep us informed explicitly.

Thanks,



amp.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
cdt.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
dltk.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emf-query2.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emft-ecoretools.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emft-eef.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emft-egf.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emft-emffacet.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
epp-mpc.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
gmp-gmf-tooling.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
gyrex.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
jwt.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mat.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mdt-modisco.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mdt-papyrus.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mft.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mylyn-docs-intent.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
pdt.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
rap.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
recommenders.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
rtp.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
scout.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
soa-bpel.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
soa-sca.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
tcf.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
tm.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to