WTP has declared M4 build, so +3 projects with WTP dependencies can now proceed. Thanks!
> Wouldn't you just build against the candidate that they have already > contributed? That would produce a milestone candidate, not a final milestone contribution, which would still need to be re-built and re-tested against the actual final versions of all dependencies. I understand the difficulties in delivering circular dependencies, which does require some seriously fuzzy releng, but most projects on the release train do not have a circular dependencies. We have the +1/+2/+3 system. - Konstantin From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Arthorne Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 12:04 PM To: Cross project issues Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? Wouldn't you just build against the candidate that they have already contributed? I don't follow how this prevents a project from contributing their own candidate to the aggregation. There are enough circular dependencies between projects at the same "level" in the train that we could never produce anything if nobody contributed a candidate until all their upstream dependencies are declared themselves completely done. For example Platform requires EMF and vice-versa, so we each need to build against each other's candidates before either can be "done". John From: "Konstantin Komissarchik" <[email protected]> To: "'Cross project issues'" <[email protected]>, "'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.'" <[email protected]>, Date: 12/19/2012 02:56 PM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? Sent by: [email protected] _____ Just to clarify… Presence in the aggregation build is only one necessary aspect. Many projects are waiting on WTP to declare M4, so we know what to build against. - Konstantin From: [email protected] [ <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck Bridgham Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:10 AM To: General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. Cc: 'Cross project issues'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? We are in the candidate aggregation build, we just delayed the "official" declare because all teams were delayed being down in numbers this time of year. The declare is coming very soon - (Carl is on vacation officially...) Thanks - Chuck Senior Architect, RAD Java EE Tools, WTP PMC Lead IBM Software Lab - Research Triangle Park, NC From: "Konstantin Komissarchik" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: "'General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.'" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Cc: "'Cross project issues'" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Date: 12/19/2012 12:28 PM Subject: [wtp-dev] ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? Sent by: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] _____ Is there an ETA for declaring WTP M4 build? I see that every project besides JSDT and releng have signed off? <http://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_Smoke_Test_Results_R350_12172012> http://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_Smoke_Test_Results_R350_12172012 The lack of WTP M4 build is blocking all of the downstream projects from making their M4 contributions. - Konstantin_______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
