some more considerations:

If we accelerate the release cycle this would also put an extra burden on the 
Eclipse legal staff, PMO and EMO (IP log approvals,
release reviews...)
Also, in my experience I need to start this process several weeks prior to the 
planned release.
A frozen IP log though means that I can't integrate 3rd party contributions any 
more into the upcoming release.

Thoughts?

Am 03.07.2013 09:22, schrieb Matthias Sohn:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Dennis Hübner <dennis.hueb...@itemis.de 
> <mailto:dennis.hueb...@itemis.de>> wrote:
>
>
>
>>     All projects contribute the latest finished release they have, 
>> dependencies are reconciled, some cross-testing happens and
>>     it's out. Every month, there is a repo with versions of all 
>> participating projects that are known to work together. Users
>>     are happy because they only need to check for updates from the aggregate 
>> repository that delivers new stuff to them
>>     frequently. Projects are happy because they can set schedules that make 
>> sense for their needs and if they miss one
>>     deadline, the next opportunity is not that far away.
>
>     Finally a good idea!
>     I think this is exactly what projects and users want.
>     Being up-to-date makes aggregation repositories (look at maven central) 
> valuable.
>
>
> I like this proposal. IMO releasing often is a good thing.
>
> Personally I most often use an M-build of the platform mixed with a recent 
> nightly
> of those projects I am contributing to in order to experience what's coming 
> in.
> At $DAYJOB we are releasing every 2 weeks.
>
> So far we (JGit/EGit) did a release every 3 months shipping a major release 
> with SR0
> and minor releases with SR1, SR2 and an additional one in Dec which doesn't 
> match
> a release train delivery. If we would get the chance to release more often 
> I'd like to
> participate in that, though I am not sure if we would be able to create a new 
> release
> every month so e.g. during vacation time it may happen that we would not ship 
> a new
> version.
>
> --
> Matthias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to