You are right. I'm in that same situation. But I'm not sure the Foundation has the resources either.
That's why we need to grow the contributor community. The more hands we have on deck the more we can do this kind of analysis and planning and get things done. Doug. From: Mickael Istria <mist...@redhat.com<mailto:mist...@redhat.com>> Reply-To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Date: Wednesday, 17 July, 2013 12:38 PM To: "cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>" <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Preferences (topic was touched in "Eclipse smells kind of dead" thread) On 07/17/2013 06:23 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote: My answer: It's something I expect the PMC to provide. Which PMC that is, is being discussed on another thread somewhere. The issue with this approach is that the PMC is made of contributors who already have job to do at their company + some leadership to provide in the Eclipse community. Does the PMC really have time to do this task correctly? IMHO, the PMC should be the first consumer of such reports, not the provider. -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat<http://www.jboss.org/tools> My blog<http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
