Yes, you have to remember, the Foundation doesn't put together releases, the projects do. And Mike is correct, there isn't consensus from the projects that a Kepler SR3 is warranted versus putting resources on Luna. The feature patch install is easy and just needs to be made more visible, as Mike is proposing to do.
Doug. ________________________________ From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Mike Milinkovich [mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:43 PM To: 'Cross project issues' Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler SR3 for Java 8? On 27/03/2014 1:28 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote: Well, it is more work, but it shouldn’t be a lot of work since the bulk of it is automated and I would think that the value to Eclipse community and Eclipse reputation would outweigh the investment. My impression is that there is no consensus that a Kepler SR3 is desirable. That is part of the reason why we're proposing the steps outlined in my email from earlier today. In any event, I think that posting on this thread was a mistake. I've started a new thread and will hopefully get some feedback on what the EF is proposing to do. -- Mike Milinkovich mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org<mailto:mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org> +1.613.220.3223
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
