The PMC has approved the review materials, and the IP Team has approved
the IP Log. With regard to the EDP, DLTK 5.1 is good-to-go.
I will update http://projects.eclipse.org/releases/luna to indicate that
DLTK 5.0 is included in Luna.
I'll leave it to the project, PMC, and Planning Council to determine
what we're going to do for SR-1.
Wayne
On 06/13/2014 10:37 AM, David M Williams wrote:
I take this as "things are fine, as they are in staging". Not sure how
this effects "release reviews", Wayne, but what is in staging now, is
the same thing that was in Kepler SR2 (i.e. already released).
At least, going by feature names/versions and bundle names/versions.
The following are the feature names/versions:
org.eclipse.dltk.core_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.core.index_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.itcl_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.rse_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.ruby_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.tcl_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
org.eclipse.dltk.xotcl_5.0.0.201306060709.jar
I'll also note that in the 5.1 "contribution attempt" there's an error
that invalidates the aggregation build ... something about a feature
missing that is named in some category.
It seems clear we should go with what we have, for Luna, and if the
DLTK project wants to do something else for Luna SR1, they need to
actively work with the "Simultaneous Release" projects that make use
of them, and participate on a regular, predictable basis, so adequate
testing, etc. can be done. I also suspect (though, know nothing of
details) that if there have been "bug fixes only" that "5.0.1" would
be more appropriate for Luna SR1, and if there are new features or
APIs, that Mars would be more appropriate.
There may be many other questions about the viability of the DLTK
project as a whole (given lack of activity and communication) but, I
think for Luna, we know what to do.
I will plan on reverting the commit in Luna, just to be clear on our
plans for Luna, and opened *_Bug 437381_*
<https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437381> to track that.
If DLTK project wants to participate in Luna SR1 or Mars, they will be
expected to be more active, timely, and communicative.
From: Simon Bernard <sbern...@sierrawireless.com>
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>,
Date: 06/13/2014 05:28 AM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DLTK in Luna RC4
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LDT (Koneki) depends on DLTK.
We never test it on DLTK 5.1. (We never found a repository to test it,
it seems available since June 11th or 12th)
There no problem for us to go with DLTK 5.0. It seems more reasonable.
Some threads to show we try to avoid that :
- _https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dltk-dev/msg02317.html_
-
_https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg10499.html_
- _https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dltk-dev/msg02324.html_
Le 12/06/2014 21:31, Wayne Beaton a écrit :
Greetings folks.
We noticed that DTLK updated their aggregation file only just this
week to point at their 5.1 bits. Too late, I'm afraid to make it into
the RC4 build (which currently includes their 2013 "5.0" bits) and EPP
packages.
Which Luna projects consume DLTK? (PDT and who else?)
Have you been testing on DLTK 5.1?
Are you good-to-go with DTLK 5.0?
What are our options?
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, _The Eclipse Foundation_
<http://www.eclipse.org/>
Learn about _Eclipse Projects_ <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>_
_EclipseCon France 2014 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2014>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
<http://www.eclipse.org>
Learn about Eclipse Projects <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>
EclipseCon France 2014 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2014>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
