On 21.08.14 22:18, Alexander Nyßen wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I was only referring to the org.eclipse.javafx bundle of e(fx)clipse, > which - as far as I understood - is basically there to deal with the > target resolving, while the org.eclipse.fx.osgi seems to perform the > runtime resolving, right? I am no expert, but as far as the target
No this is wrong org.eclipse.javafx is there so that: a) the target platform resolves b) at runtime bundles who do an import-package of javafx get physically wired to org.eclipse.javafx c) the classloader constructed for org.eclipse.javafx is provided by the org.eclipse.fx.osgi adapter hook. > resolving is concerned, there seemed to be an analogy. Maybe I'm wrong, > I'm no expert on this... Yep you are wrong. Tom _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
