RSE is no longer being actively maintained. I don’t think it is acceptable (or 
allowed) to include unmaintained components in Mars, so at a minimum, someone 
would need to agree to maintain it. This means fixing bugs, fixing build 
issues, updating documentation, provided project/ramp down plans for the 
releases, testing the M and RC versions, and contributing to the release review 
documentation. Participation in Mars also includes the SR1 and SR2 releases, so 
there would also be some work required for these also. 

If one or more people are willing to step up and agree to provide this support, 
then we could consider inclusion in Mars. Even this is problematic though, 
since RSE is very large, so would they be supporting all of RSE or only a part? 
If only a part, then we would need to determine which parts are unsupported and 
remove them.

If it is possible that other active projects (such as TCF and 
org.eclipse.remote) could be used in place of RSE, maybe it would be better to 
direct effort towards these?

Greg


On Nov 21, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <mande...@redhat.com> wrote:

> That sounds really bad :/
> This means if I grok it right that eclipse will loose its ability to mount 
> and browse Ftp and scp files systems, correct ?
> 
> If that goes eclipse becomes really weak in the already remote heavy access 
> world with cloud and containers. 
> 
> For one our server adapters utilizes this to support remote deployment to 
> file based servers. 
> 
> What would it take for keeping rse or at least parts of it alive for mars and 
> future releases ?
> 
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
> 
> 
>> On 21 Nov 2014, at 17:25, Greg Watson <g.wat...@computer.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The Target Management (TM) project is comprised of two main projects: Remote 
>> System Explorer (RSE) and Terminal. Only the Terminal project is under 
>> active development, and there are plans currently to merge this with the TCF 
>> Terminal project. We are planning to have one final release of TM (3.7) to 
>> coincide with Luna SR2, and then only provide service releases on an 
>> as-needed basis. As a consequence, we don’t have the resources to contribute 
>> to a Mars release, so are notifying everyone of our intention to withdraw 
>> from Mars. 
>> 
>> Please let us know if there are any comments or concerns regarding this.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
>> this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to