Hi Doug

Indeed, But "As stated above, /we expect that Eclipse works fine on other current Java VM and OS versions but we cannot flag these as reference platforms without significant community support for testing them."/

This is a statement of tested support. The change to jdt.core breaks Java 6 support. i.e. it guarantees non-functionality on Java 6.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 04/03/2015 16:59, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Our consensus has always been to not have a consensus. Each project moved to where they needed to be when they needed to be. Obviously the decisions of other projects affect yours, particularly the platform. And for that, I go by their project plan which has no mention of JRE 6 for Mars.

https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_5.xml

Doug.

From: Ed Willink <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Cross project issues <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 11:46 AM
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] jdt.core move to Java 7 BREE

    Hi

    (I would love it if Mars required Java 8, since I like @NonNull
    annotations and the Java 7 compatibility is really troublesome.)

    However I am keen that my project follows the Eclipse consensus,
    which does not seem to exist. My Hudson builds now fail so I need
    to know where the new consensus is.

        Regards

            Ed Willink

    On 04/03/2015 16:32, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:

    What is the rationale for wanting to keep BREE levels as low as
    possible? Even Java 7 enters the “no further public updates”
    phase in April of this year. JRE 7 users in the normal update
    pipeline were upgraded to Java 8 in January. Are there really
    users out there who _/cannot/_ run a newer version of the JRE
    despite security and performance implications of running an old
    version? I am guessing that if Mars were to require Java 8, there
    would be some initial grumbling over having to upgrade, then
    everyone moves on in a better and more secure configuration.

    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/eol-135779.html

    Thanks,

    - Konstantin

    *From:*[email protected]
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
    Of *Ed Willink
    *Sent:* Wednesday, March 04, 2015 6:57 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] jdt.core move to Java 7
    BREE

    Hi

    But this is important.

    When osgi.utils moved from Java 5 to Java 6 that made Eclipse
    almost unuseable as a Java 5 platform; not really a problem.

    Now jdt.core does nearly the same thing for Eclipse as a Java 6
    platform. Are we ready to go that far? IMHO it certainly should
    be discussed and announced.

        Regards

            Ed Willink

    On 04/03/2015 14:42, Daniel Megert wrote:

        Hi Ed

        Yes, this was intended. We never announce BREE changes.

        Dani



        From: Ed Willink <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
        To: Cross project issues
        <[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Date: 04.03.2015 15:27
        Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] jdt.core move to Java 7 BREE
        Sent by: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------




        Hi

        Is the recent change in BREE for org.eclipse.jdt.core from
        Java 6 to
        Java 7 intended?

        Was it announced?

            Regards

                Ed Willink
        _______________________________________________
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
        unsubscribe from this list, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev





        _______________________________________________

        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

        [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>

        To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
from this list, visit

        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




        No virus found in this message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
        Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9224 - Release
        Date: 03/04/15



    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    [email protected]
    To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
from this list, visit
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


    No virus found in this message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
    Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9224 - Release Date:
    03/04/15




_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9224 - Release Date: 03/04/15


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to