I tested the links in an incognito window. I swear. Maybe I should have
clued in when it asked me to log in...
Did I mention that reviewing a bajillion IP Logs is mindnumbing?
/sigh
All Mars bugs:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?classification=Eclipse%20Foundation&component=Proposals%20and%20Reviews&f1=blocked&known_name=Mars&list_id=11897506&o1=substring&product=Community&query_based_on=Mars&query_format=advanced&v1=465718
Waiting for PMC approval:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&classification=Eclipse%20Foundation&component=Proposals%20and%20Reviews&f1=blocked&f2=flagtypes.name&known_name=Mars%20waiting%20for%20PMC%20Approval&list_id=11897524&o1=anywords&o2=notsubstring&product=Community&query_based_on=Mars%20waiting%20for%20PMC%20Approval&query_format=advanced&v1=465718&v2=pmc_approved
Waiting for IP Log:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&classification=Eclipse%20Foundation&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate&component=Proposals%20and%20Reviews&f1=blocked&f2=attachments.description&f3=longdesc&known_name=Mars%20Waiting%20IP%20Log%20Submission&list_id=11897526&n3=1&o1=anywords&o2=notsubstring&o3=substring&product=Community&query_based_on=Mars%20Waiting%20IP%20Log%20Submission&query_format=advanced&v1=465718&v2=Approved%20IP%20Log&v3=IP%20Log%20to%20the%20IP%20Team
Sorry for the extra noise.
Wayne
On 05/06/15 02:56 PM, Fred Bricon wrote:
Wayne,
seems your 3 search queries are private ("The search named Mars
Waiting IP Log Submission does not exist.")
Fred
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Wayne Beaton <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Greetings folks. Before I say anything else, let me start with
this: don't panic.
I have received the required PMC Approval of the review materials
and IP Team approval of the IP Logs for most of the projects
participating in the Mars release.
If I have everything that I need from you, your project will
appear in the project activity list [1] under June 10 reviews.
Thank you for your attention in this matter of process and please
seek me out if you want a beer or something at EclipseCon.
As most of you have likely discovered, I use bugs to track each
release review [2]. I've created a couple of different queries to
help me keep track of what we're waiting for.
I'm still waiting on PMC Approval of the review materials from
several projects [3]. I am either waiting for IP Logs or am
waiting for responses regarding questions about IP Logs from
several projects [4]. If your project is on one of these lists,
you need to take action now. You've missed the deadline
participate in the June 10 review and are very late for IP Log
reviews for a June 17 review. *Immediate action is required if you
intend to release with Mars.* Maybe you can panic a little,..
If I've missed something, please first accept my humble apology,
then be kind in consideration of how mindnumbing processing a
bajillion IP Logs can be, and let me know what I've missed so that
I can take the necessary steps to remediate.
While I have your attention...
Those of you who created your own review records may have noticed
that the available dates for reviews has been made a little more
restrictive. Moving forward, we are only scheduling reviews on
first and third Wednesdays of the month. I'll admit that the
timing of the change could have been better (I probably should
have waited until post Mars) Exceptions may be permitted at my
discretion, but only with input from the PMC. My preference is to
give projects as much flexibility as possible, but, frankly, we've
been running far too many review periods over the last year or so
and I just don't have the bandwidth to continue to do weekly reviews.
Finally, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you that IP
tracking needs to be current and complete at all times. You must
obtain approval from the IP Team before you check in any third
party code libraries or code contributions for which the IP due
diligence process mandates an IP Team review. Git commits must
correctly indicate the author of the contribution and all
contributions by non-project-committers must be signed off. If you
have any questions about this, please ask your project mentors,
project lead, PMC members, or me.
Thanks!
Wayne
[1] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_activity.php
[2] http://eclip.se/4t
[3] http://eclip.se/4s
[4] http://eclip.se/4v
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon France 2015 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2015>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
And if that fails, then http://goo.gl/tnBgH5
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
EclipseCon France 2015 <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2015>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
