> Inflicting a major change on clients is not a bit of a pain, it is a major pain, particularly for those clients that are stable and consequently have minimal maintenance teams. > In some cases useful but unmaintained tools, such as UML2 Tools, are killed by the major version change.
+1 Dani From: Ed Willink <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 28.10.2015 14:29 Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] DTP major version bump for Neon Sent by: [email protected] On 28/10/2015 13:13, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote: I have no specific plans re ODA?s Java API. So absolutely no justification for a change then. There is no need for all plugins to bump together. It is cosmetically nice to see all plugins with the same version, but it just isn't tenable long term. For instance many OCL plugins remain at 3.x although those that have been affected by UML major changes have moved to 4.x and 5.x. Inflicting a major change on clients is not a bit of a pain, it is a major pain, particularly for those clients that are stable and consequently have minimal maintenance teams. In some cases useful but unmaintained tools, such as UML2 Tools, are killed by the major version change. Regards Ed Willink_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
