Regarding Target Management, IIRC there is a plan moving the Terminal to the CDT.
But what about RSE? Some packages include it now (PHP, JEE, C/C++ as far as I know)... I am a TM committer, but I can not personally support TM on the release train. Martin > On 15 Dec 2017, at 21:01, Wayne Beaton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > By way of background, we introduced the requirement that projects publicly > state their intent to participate > <https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#pmi-joining-a-simultaneous-release> > in each release to ensure that everybody is actually paying attention. In > the past, we've had to scramble to sort out last minute issues because (some) > project teams hadn't engaged. Participation in the simultaneous release > requires some ongoing investment of time and energy from those projects that > join in. > > The deadline for stating intent to join the Eclipse Photon simultaneous > release is EOB today. After that, the rules state that projects must work > through their PMC to have the Eclipse Planning Council grant an exception to > join after the deadline. > > I am pretty confident, however, that if you state your intent on this list by > mid-week next week, the Planning Council will accept it. Please, get this > done. > > Any project that has not declared an intent to participate will be removed > from the aggregation build prior to the M5 release. I'll work with Fred and > Mikael to deactivate builds early in the new year. > > AFAICT, the following projects have not stated their intention to participate. > Eclipse EGerrit > Eclipse e(fx)clipse > Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform (PTP) > Eclipse Sapphire > Eclipse Sphinx > Eclipse Target Management > Eclipse Communication Framework > Eclipse XWT > Eclipse PMF > Eclipse Orion > Eclipse Accessibility Tools Framework > Eclipse ATL > Eclipse Subversive SVN Team Provider > Eclipse Data Tools Platform > If you represent one of these projects and have chosen not to participate, > please let the group know. > > If you're listed here in error, I apologise. Please send me a harshly worded > note pointing out my omission. > > I am working with the Eclipse Data Tools Platform, so we'll likely get that > resolved shortly. > > The Eclipse Subversive team has indicated that they can no longer support the > project, so we're going to have to sort out what (if anything) to do about > that. > > Since I'm pretty sure that the Eclipse Packaging Project is paying attention > (and I am a committer on the project), I've created a 4.8 release > <https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.packaging/releases/4.8> at > +4 (consider this the project's declaration of participation). > > Thanks for your attention, > > Wayne > -- > Wayne Beaton > Director of Open Source Projects > The Eclipse Foundation > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
