|
On 10/30/18 11:29, Daniel Megert wrote:
Hi Ed Wouldn't it be best to update the wiki document, Version Numbering [1], with some explicit guideline in the hope for consistency between projects? Or, do you think the pointer to Evolving Java-based APIs [2] suffices? It does have a section there that includes the following sentence: [...] obsolete API elements are notoriously difficult to get rid of. Obsolete API elements should be marked as deprecated and point new customers at the new API that replaces it, but need to continue working as advertised for a couple more releases until the expense of breakage is low enough that it can be deleted. But I think explicitness is best. I am not sure "... the expense of breakage is low enough ..." would be interpreted as "no major version change required". I have opened Bug 540859 in case further discussion is required it can be done there. Thanks, [1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Version_Numbering [2] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Evolving_Java-based_APIs [3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=540859 |
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
